首页> 外文期刊>Progress in computational fluid dynamics >A comparative study of immersed-boundary and interpolated bounce-back methods in LBE
【24h】

A comparative study of immersed-boundary and interpolated bounce-back methods in LBE

机译:LBE中浸入边界和插值反弹方法的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Interpolated Bounce-Back (IBB) method and Immersed-Boundary (IB) method are compared for fluid-solid boundary conditions in the Lattice Boltzmann Equation (LBE) in terms of their numerical accuracy and computational efficiency. We carry out simulations for the flow past a circular cylinder asymmetrically placed in the channel in two dimensions with the Reynolds number Re = 20 and 100, corresponding to steady and unsteady flows, respectively. The results obtained by the LBE method are compared with the existing data. We observe that the LBE with either the IBB or IB methods for the no-slip boundary conditions exhibits a second-order rate of convergence. While the computational cost for both methods are comparable, the interpolated bounce-back method is more accurate than the immersed-boundary method with the same mesh size. Consequently the IBB method is more efficient computationally, while the IB method is easier to implement.
机译:在数值精确度和计算效率方面,比较了内插反弹(IBB)方法和浸入边界(IB)方法在Lattice Boltzmann方程(LBE)中的流固边界条件。我们对流过二维不对称放置在通道中的圆柱体的流进行了二维模拟,其中雷诺数Re = 20和100,分别对应于稳定流和非稳定流。将LBE方法获得的结果与现有数据进行比较。我们观察到,采用IBB或IB方法的LBE在无滑移边界条件下表现出二阶收敛速度。尽管两种方法的计算成本是可比的,但插补反跳方法比具有相同网格大小的浸入边界方法更准确。因此,IBB方法的计算效率更高,而IB方法更易于实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号