...
首页> 外文期刊>Professional safety >Safety Audits: Comparing the Results of Two Studies
【24h】

Safety Audits: Comparing the Results of Two Studies

机译:安全审核:比较两项研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It is interesting how the span of 20 years can demonstrate support for basic elements of a safety audit program and at the same time reveal a shift toward less support of other elements. According to these survey respondents, new employee orientation is the most-important element of an audit program. Ergonomics gained support while support for incentive programs declined. A few surprises were noted during the 2000 survey as well. For example, why would someone score facility sanitation, employee safety meetings and use of accident investigation as "totally inappropriate" in a safety program? Results of both studies should be valuable to anyone considering a safety and health audit program. In addition, the 60 elements listed provide a comprehensive list of components of a sound safety program. The support, or lack of support, for the various elements rated can help guide program development.
机译:有趣的是,20年的时间如何证明对安全审核计划基本要素的支持,同时又揭示了向其他要素更少支持的转变。这些受访者认为,新员工入职是审计计划中最重要的要素。人机工程学获得了支持,而对激励计划的支持却下降了。在2000年的调查中也注意到了一些意外。例如,为什么有人在安全程序中将设施卫生,员工安全会议和事故调查的使用评为“完全不合适”?两项研究的结果对考虑进行安全与健康审核计划的任何人都应该是有价值的。此外,列出的60个元素提供了声音安全程序的组件的完整列表。对所评级的各种要素的支持或缺乏支持可以帮助指导程序的开发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号