...
首页> 外文期刊>Professional safety >Targeting Zero: Eight Questions to Ask Before Using Zero as a Safety Target
【24h】

Targeting Zero: Eight Questions to Ask Before Using Zero as a Safety Target

机译:零目标:使用零作为安全目标之前要问的八个问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Shooting 60 on a golf course or batting 0.380 for a baseball season are rare achievements of excellence even though they fall well short of perfection. Setting zero as a target may seem logical and it may feel easy to administer, but it could harm an organization's safety efforts. It may have questionable effects on employee motivation; it may involve as-sumptions that are either wrong or unreliable; and it may prevent an organization from improving. Since zero-injury targets are voluntary, and since they are merely one option among many, doubts surrounding their effectiveness should spur any organization to consider other approaches. Instead of focusing on zero, talk about something else. Such conversations may be the first steps toward an improved safety culture that may actually lead to (you guessed it) zero injuries.
机译:即使在高尔夫球场上投60球或在棒球季击球0.380也是极少见的成就,尽管它们远未达到完美水平。将零设置为目标可能看起来合乎逻辑,并且可能易于管理,但可能会损害组织的安全工作。它可能对员工的动机产生可疑的影响;它可能包含错误或不可靠的假设;它可能会阻止组织的进步。由于零伤害目标是自愿的,并且它们只是众多选择中的一种,因此围绕其有效性的疑问应促使任何组织考虑其他方法。与其关注零,不如谈论其他事情。此类对话可能是迈向改善安全文化的第一步,实际上可能导致(您猜对)零伤害。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Professional safety》 |2015年第4期|40-45|共6页
  • 作者

    Michael Burnham;

  • 作者单位

    Cherry Hill, NJ;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号