【24h】

A different point of hue

机译:不同的色调

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A distinguished line-up of scholars recently got together to stir up discussion about the physiological basis for color and have, with a simple manipulation of decades-old data, challenged one of the fundamental tenets of our current understanding of the neurobiology of color. Understanding color is not easy. Newton made some headway, but his demonstration of color's physical basis provided only limited insight because, as Young pointed out, there simply is not enough space for a receptor for each of the seven million or so perceivable colors at each retinal location. Young argued for a triplet color code, and we now know that such a code exists in the form of the three cone types (Fig. 1). Young's idea made color a construction of the brain, not a physical attribute, and paved the way for opponent color theory in which color is determined not by trichromacy but by three opponent processes: red-green, blue-yellow, and black-white. This theory gained ground because it accounted for the fact that we are unable to see a continuous mixture of "reddish-greens" and "bluish-yellows," which should be perceivable if color were simply trichromatic.
机译:最近,一批杰出的学者聚集在一起,讨论了色彩的生理学基础,并通过简单地操纵了数十年的数据,挑战了我们目前对色彩神经生物学的基本原理之一。了解颜色并不容易。牛顿取得了一些进展,但是他对颜色的物理基础的展示仅提供了有限的见解,因为正如Young指出的那样,在每个视网膜位置上,700万种左右可感知的颜色中的每种颜色都没有足够的空间容纳受体。 Young主张使用三元组颜色代码,现在我们知道这种代码以三种圆锥类型的形式存在(图1)。 Young的想法使颜色成为大脑的构造,而不是物理属性,并为反对派颜色理论铺平了道路,在该理论中,颜色不是由三色性决定,而是由三个反对者过程决定:红绿色,蓝黄色和黑白色。该理论之所以得到发展,是因为它解释了一个事实,即我们无法看到“红绿色”和“蓝黄色”的连续混合物,如果颜色只是三色的,则应该可以理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号