首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part L, Journal of Materials: Design and Application >Comparison of responses of different types of steel alloys under the same loading and environmental conditions
【24h】

Comparison of responses of different types of steel alloys under the same loading and environmental conditions

机译:不同类型钢合金在相同加载和环境条件下的反应比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Modern construction must meet the function for which it has been made and must be safe and economical to operate. In order to achieve the foregoing, the design of the structure should strive for an optimal solution. Such a design is usually based on the optimal choice of material and the optimal dimensions of structural elements. In order to select the optimal material for the manufacture of structural elements, it is necessary to have data on the behavior of the material in the intended operating conditions. In this sense, this paper deals with experimental research and analysis of the behavior of several types of materials subjected to approximately the same operating conditions. Under considerations were low-alloy structural steel (1.7225), special structural steel (1.7147), alloy carbon steel (1.5920), and alloy stainless steel (1.4034). The mechanical behavior of the tested materials, in terms of monitoring changes and mutual comparisons of mechanical properties, is shown on the basis of engineering stress–strain diagrams, while their creep resistances are monitored and compared with each other based on creep curves. As for the fracture toughness, it can be estimated based on the results of the fracture impact energy test, applying the known calculation method. In accordance with the tests performed at room temperature, the following results related to the maximum ultimate tensile strength ( σ m /MPa), Charpy V-notch impact energy ( CVN /J), and fatigue limit ( σ f / MPa ) at stress ratio R , are shown as follows: [Mat. Nr. σ m / MPa ;   CVN / J ;   σ f , R / MPa 20 ,   and   their   magnitudes   are : 1.7225   733 ;   166 ;   532 0.25 20 ; 1.7147   560 ;   178 ;   − 20 ;   1.5920   612 ;   220 ;   285 − 1 20 ; 1.4034   782 ;   8 ;   325 − 1 20 .
机译:现代化建筑必须符合其制造的功能,并且必须安全且经济运行。为了实现前述,结构的设计应该努力实现最佳解决方案。这种设计通常基于材料的最佳选择和结构元件的最佳尺寸。为了选择用于制造结构元件的最佳材料,有必要具有关于预期操作条件中材料的行为的数据。从这个意义上讲,本文涉及实验研究和分析几种经受大约相同操作条件的材料的行为。在考虑下是低合金结构钢(1.7225),特殊的结构钢(1.7147),合金碳钢(1.5920)和合金不锈钢(1.4034)。基于工程应力 - 应变图示出了在监测机械性能的变化和相互比较方面,测试材料的机械特性,而基于蠕变曲线监测并彼此相互比较它们的蠕变电阻。至于断裂韧性,可以基于裂缝冲击能量测试的结果来估计,施加已知的计算方法。根据在室温下进行的测试,以下与最大抗拉强度(σm/ mpa),夏比V-intch冲击能量(cvn / j)和疲劳极限(σf/ mpa)相关的结果比率r,如下所示:[垫。 NR。 σm/ mpa; cvn / j; σf,r / mpa 20及其大小是:1.7225 733; 166; 532 0.25 20; 1.7147 560; 178; - 20; 1.5920 612; 220; 285 - 1 20; 1.4034 782; 8; 325 - 1 20。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号