首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers >Conducting risk analysis in public transport networks - guidelines for users
【24h】

Conducting risk analysis in public transport networks - guidelines for users

机译:在公共交通网络中进行风险分析-用户指南

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ensuring the security of public transport is particularly challenging for reasons such as the open and accessible nature of public transport networks and the limited resources of the operators. Conducting a security risk assessment study is therefore a useful starting point. First, a risk analysis is conducted to establish the occurrence and impact of threats on the network. This is then followed by a vulnerability assessment study, which helps to decide where and how to invest scarce resources to protect the system. To summarize, we can say that: Risk Assessment = Risk Analysis + Vulnerability Assessment. Due to length restrictions, the present article will focus on risk analysis. The issue of the vulnerability assessment can be found in the full study. A security risk analysis is different to a safety risk analysis. For example, a safety risk analysis can make use of frequency of occurrence of safety events using data from experience. Due to the rarity of terrorist attacks on public transport, the element of frequency cannot be used for a security risk analysis. The International Association of Public Transport (UITP) Security Commission identified security risk assessment as a priority topic for research. Therefore, in the context of COUNTERACT, a European project funded by the European Commission, UITP and the project team developed 'Generic Guidelines for Conducting Security Risk Assessment in Public Transport Networks'. The user-friendly guidelines, which were successfully tested by an urban public transport operator, outline a qualitative risk assessment methodology which can be adapted by the operator to suit specific needs, in a step-by-step approach, specifically designed for public transport. This article will outline how the methodology was developed, as well as lessons learned from the test which was carried out. To supplement these User Guidelines, further details of the risk assessment methodology are presented in the accompanying paper by Sanchez.
机译:由于公共交通网络的开放性和可访问性以及运营商的资源有限等原因,确保公共交通的安全性尤其具有挑战性。因此,进行安全风险评估研究是一个有用的起点。首先,进行风险分析以建立威胁的发生和对网络的影响。然后进行漏洞评估研究,以帮助确定在何处以及如何投资稀缺资源来保护系统。总而言之,我们可以说:风险评估=风险分析+漏洞评估。由于篇幅所限,本文将重点介绍风险分析。漏洞评估的问题可以在完整的研究中找到。安全风险分析不同于安全风险分析。例如,安全风险分析可以利用来自经验的数据来利用安全事件的发生频率。由于对公共交通工具进行恐怖袭击的罕见性,频率元素不能用于安全风险分析。国际公共运输协会(UITP)安全委员会将安全风险评估确定为研究的优先主题。因此,在COUNTERACT的背景下,由欧洲委员会,UITP和项目团队资助的欧洲项目制定了“在公共交通网络中进行安全风险评估的通用准则”。用户友好型指南已由城市公共交通运营商成功测试,概述了定性风险评估方法,运营商可以采用分步骤的方法,将其定为适合特定需求的方法,专门为公共交通设计。本文将概述方法的开发方式,以及从测试中获得的经验教训。为了补充这些用户指南,Sanchez在随附的论文中提供了风险评估方法的更多详细信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号