...
首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers >Discussion: Fidic's Red Book 1999 edition: a study review
【24h】

Discussion: Fidic's Red Book 1999 edition: a study review

机译:讨论:Fidic的《红皮书》 1999年版:研究回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

With reference to Hillig et al. (2010) I suggest that it would have been more appropriate to compare the Fidic '99 suite of contracts with NEC3, rather than the Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT) contracts, as NEC3 is designed for civil engineering works as is Fidic '99. Furthermore, the suite should be considered as a whole, including the recent Gold Book, rather than concentrating on one form. Clauses from different documents in the suite can replace the standard clauses in another version without compromising the integrity of the contract. Thus the ad hoc dispute adjudication board (DAB) specified in the Yellow Book can be replaced by the full-time DAB in the Red Book, if appropriate.
机译:参考希利格等。 (2010年)我建议将Fidic '99合同套件与NEC3进行比较,而不是联合合同法庭(JCT)合同,因为NEC3与Fidic '99一样是为土木工程设计的。此外,应该将套件视为一个整体,包括最近的《金书》,而不是只关注一种形式。套件中不同文档中的条款可以替换另一版本中的标准条款,而不会影响合同的完整性。因此,如果适用,黄皮书中指定的临时争议裁决委员会(DAB)可以由红皮书中的专职DAB代替。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号