...
【24h】

Is 5 the Magic Number?

机译:5是魔法数字吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It doesn't seem long ago I wrote a piece on Type 4.5 solder pastes and their printing advantages for miniaturized geometries. A quick search of my archives, however, revealed it's been nearly four years since that column appeared! In that time, much has changed in terms of manufacturers' movement toward the integration of devices like 01005s and 0.3mm CSPs, as well as the number of evaluations of metric 0201s and metric 03015s taking place. More and more, our printing applications experts are being asked about 150um deposit sizes and the process implications of such small material volumes. This, indeed, pushes the process limits and leads me back to the basics of what I refer to as the "five particle rule." In short, this rule I was taught when I began in SMT states that if the particle size of the solder paste is not such that five particles will fit shoulder to shoulder on the narrowest aperture, it's likely an indication of potential printing problems. And, these issues are regardless of speeds, squeegee pressures, stencil thickness, board quality and even the printer; they are solely dictated by particle count per aperture. While I've never come across any paper that explains the physics of this rule, in my experience it has proven to be absolutely accurate.
机译:不久前,我写了一篇有关4.5型焊膏及其在缩小几何尺寸方面的印刷优势的文章。但是,对我的档案进行的快速搜索显示,距该专栏出现已经有四年了!那时,制造商朝着集成诸如01005和0.3mm CSP之类的设备迈进了很多,并且对公制0201和公制03015进行了评估。越来越多的印刷应用专家被问到150um的沉积尺寸以及如此小的材料量对工艺的影响。实际上,这推动了过程限制,并使我回到所谓的“五个粒子规则”的基础。简而言之,当我从SMT开始学习时,我就被教导这个规则:如果焊膏的粒径不能使五个颗粒在最窄的孔上并排放置,则很可能表明潜在的印刷问题。而且,这些问题与速度,刮刀压力,模板厚度,纸板质量甚至打印机无关。它们仅由每个孔的颗粒数决定。尽管我从没碰到过任何能解释该规则物理原理的论文,但据我的经验证明,它是绝对准确的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号