...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Power Systems >Evaluating DSM: can an engineer count on it? A short note paper summarizing a panel session at the July 1992 summer power meeting
【24h】

Evaluating DSM: can an engineer count on it? A short note paper summarizing a panel session at the July 1992 summer power meeting

机译:评估DSM:工程师可以依靠它吗?简短的便笺纸,总结了1992年7月夏季权力会议上的小组会议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is an increasing interest in demand-side management (DSM) by utilities and regulators throughout the USA. With this interest, there is an increasing need for DSM evaluation. Regulators expect utility engineers to use least cost planning and integrated resource planning approaches to adjust their generation capacity plans to reflect DSM. Increasingly, utilities are considering DSM to affect their T&D capacity plans. However, major utility DSM programs are less than a decade old. This leaves many utility engineers uneasy. How do they know that DSM will be there when they really need it? To verify and improve the contribution of DSM programs, utility analysts have developed a set of methodologies and procedures for evaluating DSM. The purpose of this panel session was to review these state of the art evaluations and the lessons learned from them so far. The authors explore the differences inherent in evaluating DSM at the T&D level versus the generation level, and review DSM's persistence and reliability in the residential, commercial, and industrial sectors.
机译:在美国,公用事业和监管机构对需求侧管理(DSM)的兴趣日益浓厚。出于这种兴趣,越来越需要进行DSM评估。监管机构希望公用事业工程师使用最少的成本计划和集成的资源计划方法来调整其发电量计划,以反映出DSM。公用事业越来越多地考虑DSM影响其T&D能力计划。但是,主要的实用DSM程序不到十年。这使许多公用事业工程师感到不安。他们怎么知道DSM何时真正需要它?为了验证和改进DSM计划的贡献,公用事业分析人员已经开发出一套评估DSM的方法和程序。这次小组会议的目的是回顾这些最新的评估以及迄今为止从中获得的教训。作者探索了在T&D级别与发电级别评估DSM的内在差异,并回顾了DSM在住宅,商业和工业领域的持久性和可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号