首页> 外文期刊>Population, Space and Place >Chronicling Kenyan Asian Diasporic Histories: ‘Newcomers’, ‘Established’ Migrants, and the Post-Colonial Practices of Time-Work
【24h】

Chronicling Kenyan Asian Diasporic Histories: ‘Newcomers’, ‘Established’ Migrants, and the Post-Colonial Practices of Time-Work

机译:记载肯尼亚亚洲人流放的历史:“新移民”,“老牌”移民和后殖民时间工作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recent studies of international migration have observed its increasing complexity. Circular, return, and temporary migration between India and Kenya, arising from the economic and political multipolarities of increasing South-South partnerships, is one example of such complexity. These flows are distinct from the migration patterns of the longer-established Kenyan Asian diaspora, who settled under the auspices of the British Empire from the 1890s until the beginning of the 1960s. This paper explores how these transformations are negotiated through the dynamics of Kenyan Asians' ongoing post-colonial liminalities and ambiguities of citizenship, focusing in particular on the temporal production of distinctions between ‘newcomers’ and ‘established’ migrants, even when in practice these distinctions are much more fluid. This paper highlights the regulatory practices of ‘time-work’ that enfold the migratory chronologies of ‘established’ migrants into the time of the nation, whilst excluding those of ‘newcomers’. It explores the selective remembering, forgetting, and reworking of the colonial past, a process informed by the dynamics of modernity, diaspora, nation, and postcoloniality in contemporary Kenya. It argues that whilst distinctions between ‘established’ and ‘newcomer’ migrants might reflect different positionings in transnational social fields, differences are also negotiated in contradictions between the experiences, meanings, and understandings of time. This demonstrates how space on its own is itself a inadequate conceptual lens with which to examine relationships between ‘newcomers’ and ‘established’ migrants, and that further research is needed that attends to the temporal dynamics mediating the temporal dissonances of contemporary transnational social fields. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:最近对国际移徙的研究发现其日益复杂。由于南南伙伴关系日益增加的经济和政治多极化,印度和肯尼亚之间的回程,回返和临时移徙就是这种复杂性的一个例子。这些流动有别于历史悠久的肯尼亚亚洲散居人口,后者从1890年代到1960年代初在大英帝国的主持下定居。本文探讨了如何通过肯尼亚亚洲人持续进行的后殖民主义倾向和公民身份模糊性来谈判这些转变,特别是侧重于“新移民”和“既定”移民之间的区别的暂时产生,即使实际上这些区别更流畅。本文着重介绍了“打工”的监管做法,将“既定”移民的迁徙年表纳入了国家的时间范围,但不包括“新移民”的行为。它探索了对殖民地过去的选择性记忆,遗忘和改造,这一过程是由当代肯尼亚的现代性,侨民,民族和后殖民时代的动态所推动的。它认为,虽然“既定”移民和“新移民”移民之间的区别可能反映了跨国社会领域中的不同立场,但在经历,含义和对时间的理解之间也存在协商分歧。这表明,空间本身本身就是一个不足的概念镜头,无法用来检验“新移民”与“老大”移民之间的关系,还需要进一步的研究,以时态动力为中介来研究当代跨国社会领域的时态失调。版权所有©2015 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号