首页> 外文期刊>Population health management >HEDIS Initiation and Engagement Quality Measures of Substance Use Disorder Care: Impact of Setting and Health Care Specialty
【24h】

HEDIS Initiation and Engagement Quality Measures of Substance Use Disorder Care: Impact of Setting and Health Care Specialty

机译:HEDIS物质使用失调护理的启动和参与质量衡量:环境和卫生保健专业的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many health care systems track the HEDIS measures of initiation and engagement in substance use disorder (SUD) care. However, the impact of setting of care (inpatient vs. outpatient) and health care specialty (SUD, psychiatric, other) on the likelihood of patients meeting the initiation and engagement criteria are unknown. If the vast majority of initiation and engagement occurs within SUD specialty clinics, then these quality measures could be used to discriminate among and incentivize SUD clinic managers. However, if these criteria are satisfied in different settings and specialties, then they should be considered characteristics of the entire facility, rather than just specialty SUD units.rnUsing a Markov model, the probabilities of advancing to treatment initiation and engagement given initial setting and specialty of care were estimated for 320,238 SUD-diagnosed Veterans Health Affairs (VA) patients. Patients in SUD specialty units progressed more often (diagnosis to initiation, initiation to engagement) than patients in other specialties. Progression through the criteria differed for inpatients vs. outpatients. Approximately 25% of initiation and over 40% of engagement occurred outside of SUD specialty care.rnVA patients who have contact with SUD specialty treatment have higher rates of advancing to initiation, and from initiation to engagement, compared to SUD-diagnosed patients in psychiatric or other medical locations. Even so, a substantial portion of initiation and engagement occurs outside of SUD specialty units. Therefore, these quality measures should be considered measures of facility performance rather than measures of the quality of SUD specialty care. The usual combining of inpatient and outpatient performance on these measures into overall facility scores clouds measurement and interpretation.
机译:许多医疗保健系统都跟踪HEDIS进行药物滥用障碍(SUD)护理的启动和参与措施。但是,医护设置(住院患者与门诊患者)和卫生保健专业(SUD,精神病学等)对患者符合启动和参与标准的可能性的影响尚不清楚。如果绝大部分的启动和参与都发生在SUD专科诊所内,则可以使用这些质量指标来区分和激励SUD专科诊所经理。但是,如果在不同的环境和专业中都满足这些标准,则应将其视为整个设施的特征,而不仅仅是特殊的SUD单位。使用马尔可夫模型,在初始设置和特殊条件下推进治疗开始和参与的可能性估计有320,238名经SUD诊断的退伍军人健康事务(VA)患者接受了治疗。 SUD专科病房的患者比其他专科病患者的进展更快(诊断到开始,开始参与)。对于住院患者和门诊患者,通过标准的进展情况有所不同。大约25%的启动和超过40%的参与发生在SUD专科护理之外。与SUD诊断的精神病患者或精神病患者相比,接触SUD专科治疗的rnVA患者进展到启动以及从启动到参与的比率更高。其他医疗地点。即使这样,启动和参与的很大一部分还是发生在SUD专业部门之外。因此,应将这些质量度量视为设施性能的度量,而不是SUD专科护理质量的度量。通常将这些措施的住院和门诊表现结合到整体设施得分中,从而对测量和解释产生影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Population health management》 |2009年第4期|191-196|共6页
  • 作者单位

    VA Center for Health Care Evaluation 795 Willow Road (MPD-152) Menlo Park, CA 94025;

    Center for Health Care Evaluation, Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, and Stanford University School of Medicine, Menlo Park, California;

    Center for Health Care Evaluation, Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, and Stanford University School of Medicine, Menlo Park, California;

    Center for Health Care Evaluation, Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, and Stanford University School of Medicine, Menlo Park, California;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号