首页> 外文期刊>Population health management >Impact of Area Deprivation Index on Coronary Stent Utilization in a Medicare Nationwide Cohort
【24h】

Impact of Area Deprivation Index on Coronary Stent Utilization in a Medicare Nationwide Cohort

机译:全国医疗保障队列中区域剥夺指数对冠状动脉支架使用的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a marker of neighborhood deprivation. This study investigates utilization of coronary bare-metal stent (BMS) and drug- eluting stent (DES) in Medicare patients across hospitals with varying ADI. Data were abstracted using Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) codes 249 (BMS without major complications or comorbidities [MCC]), 246, and 247 (DES with and without MCC, respectively) from the 2011-2012 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data Inpatient File, which was linked to American Hospital Association data (to determine bed size, location, ownership, teaching status), and ADI for each hospital zip code was obtained. Hospitals were divided into quintiles using ADI values: Quintile 1 (privileged) to Quintile 5 (deprived). Logistic regression was conducted to determine odds ratios (ORs) for DES utilization across ADI quintiles. There were 313,739 discharges with DRG codes 246 (52,839), 247 (203,928), and 249 (56,972). DES utilization was lower in the deprived quintile, irrespective of teaching status. It was lower in larger hospitals and hospitals with more annual stent discharges, urban locations and nongovernment not-for-profit institutes. Lower odds of DES utilization were found in Quintile 2 (OR-0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.93, P<0.001), Quintile 3 (OR-0.89, 95% CI 0.86-0.92, P< 0.001), and Quintile 4 (OR-0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98, P= 0.001) versus Quintile 1 and there was no difference in utilization of DES in Quintile 5 (OR-1.01, 95% CI 0.98-1.04, P=0.6) versus Quintile 1. Significant differences exist in DES utilization in a large, uniformly insured cohort based on neighborhood deprivation.
机译:区域剥夺指数(ADI)是邻里剥夺的标志。这项研究调查了不同ADI医院之间的Medicare患者使用冠状裸金属支架(BMS)和药物洗脱支架(DES)的情况。使用诊断相关组(DRG)代码249(无重大并发症或合并症的BMS),246和247(分别具有和不具有MCC的DES)从2011-2012年Medicare提供商使用和支付数据住院患者中提取数据已获得文件,该文件已链接到美国医院协会的数据(以确定床位大小,位置,所有权,教学状况)和每个医院邮政编码的ADI。使用ADI值将医院分为五分位数:五分位数1(有特权)到五分位数5(有特权)。进行逻辑回归以确定在ADI五分位数中使用DES的优势比(OR)。有313,739次放电,DRG代码分别为246(52,839),247(203,928)和249(56,972)。不论教学状况如何,在被剥夺的五分位数中,DES的利用率都较低。在大型医院和每年支架排出量较多的医院,城市地区和非政府非营利机构中,这一比例较低。五分位数2(OR-0.9,95%置信区间[CI] 0.87-0.93,P <0.001),五分位数3(OR-0.89,95%CI 0.86-0.92,P <0.001)中发现DES利用率较低的可能性,和Quintile 4(OR-0.95,95%CI 0.92-0.98,P = 0.001)与Quintile 1的比较,Quintile 5中DES的利用率没有差异(OR-1.01,95%CI 0.98-1.04,P = 0.6)相对于五分位数1.在基于邻里剥夺的统一保险的大型队列中,DES利用率存在显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号