首页> 外文期刊>Population Ecology >Are exotic invaders less susceptible to native predators? A test using native and exotic mosquito species in New Zealand
【24h】

Are exotic invaders less susceptible to native predators? A test using native and exotic mosquito species in New Zealand

机译:外来入侵者难免受到本地掠食者的侵害吗?使用新西兰的本地和外来蚊种进行的测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A major hypothesis in invasion ecology is that native predators have less impact on exotic relative to native prey species. Here, we tested this hypothesis by examining the New Zealand native predator Anisops wakefieldi consuming native (Culex pervigilans) and exotic (Aedes notoscriptus) mosquito larvae. Anisops wakefieldi exhibited a decelerating type II functional response for both prey species, but at high prey densities consumed more of the exotic mosquito Ae. notoscriptus. A significantly higher attack rate was observed for the native predator feeding on exotic species. In the presence of both prey species, the predator showed preferences towards Ae. notoscriptus and demonstrated switching behavior towards this exotic species. The preference of the native predator towards the exotic mosquito appeared related to behavioral differences between the two prey species. We tested the behavioral response of both mosquito species in four conditions; (1) control (without predators), (2) free-roaming predators, (3) caged predators, and (4) kairomones only. Resting activities at the water surface and wall positions were the most frequently behaviors exhibited by Cx. pervigilans in the presence of predator. In contrast, the exotic species Ae. notoscriptus demonstrated significantly higher levels of “thrashing” behaviors, apparently making itself more obvious to the predators. The behaviors showed by Cx. pervigilans fulfilled the “threat sensitivity hypothesis”. No evidence here supported the idea that exotic mosquito species are less prone to the influence of native predators and the “escape from natural enemies” hypothesis seems not apply in our study. In fact, we observed that this invader was more susceptible to the predator.
机译:入侵生态学的一个主要假设是,与本地猎物相比,本地掠食者对外来物种的影响较小。在这里,我们通过研究消耗本地(Culex pervigilans)和外来(Aedes notoscriptus)蚊子幼虫的新西兰本地捕食者Anisopsakefieldi检验了这一假设。两种动物都表现出减速的II型功能响应,但是在高密度的猎物上,它们消耗了更多的外来蚊Ae。 notoscriptus。观察到以外来物种为食的本地捕食者的攻击率明显更高。在两种猎物都存在的情况下,捕食者表现出对Ae的偏爱。 notoscriptus,并证明了向该外来物种的转换行为。本地天敌对外来蚊子的偏好似乎与两种猎物之间的行为差​​异有关。我们在四个条件下测试了这两种蚊子的行为反应。 (1)个控制项(没有捕食者),(2个)自由漫游的捕食者,(3个)笼状捕食者和(4个)仅海洛酮。在水表面和壁位置的休息活动是Cx最常见的行为。食肉动物在食肉动物。相反,外来物种Ae。 notoscriptus表现出明显更高的“重击”行为,显然对掠食者更明显。 Cx显示的行为。百日草满足了“威胁敏感性假设”。这里没有证据支持这样的观点,即外来蚊虫物种不太容易受到本地捕食者的影响,“逃避天敌”的假设似乎在我们的研究中不适用。实际上,我们观察到该入侵者更容易受到掠食者的攻击。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号