...
首页> 外文期刊>Polymer Degradation and Stability >Sustainability assessments of bio-based polymers
【24h】

Sustainability assessments of bio-based polymers

机译:生物基聚合物的可持续性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Bio-based polymers have become feasible alternatives to traditional petroleum-based plastics. However, the factors that influence the sustainability of bio-based polymers are often unclear. This paper reviews published life cycle assessments (LCAs) and commonly used LCA databases that quantify the environmental sustainability of bio-based polymers and summarizes the range of findings reported within the literature. LCA is discussed as a means for quantifying environmental impacts for a product from its cradle, or raw materials extraction, to the grave, or end of life. The results of LCAs from existing databases as well as peer-reviewed literature allow for the comparison of environmental impacts. This review compares standard database results for three bio-based polymers, polylactic acid (PLA), poly-hydroxyalkanoate (PHA), and thermoplastic starch (TPS) with five common petroleum derived polymers. The literature showed that biopolymers, coming out of a relatively new industry, exhibit similar impacts compared to petroleum-based plastics. The studies reviewed herein focused mainly on global warming potential (GWP) and fossil resource depletion while largely ignoring other environmental impacts, some of which result in environmental tradeoffs. The studies reviewed also varied greatly in the scope of their assessment. Studies that included the end of life (EOL) reported much higher GWP results than those that limited the scope to resin or granule production. Including EOL in the LCA provides more comprehensive results for biopolymers, but simultaneously introduces greater amounts of uncertainty and variability. Little life-cycle data is available on the impacts of different manners of disposal, thus it will be critical for future sustainability assessments of biopolymers to include accurate end of life impacts.
机译:生物基聚合物已经成为传统石油基塑料的可行替代品。但是,影响生物基聚合物可持续性的因素通常不清楚。本文回顾了已发表的生命周期评估(LCA)和常用的LCA数据库,这些数据库对生物基聚合物的环境可持续性进行了量化,并总结了文献中报道的发现范围。 LCA被讨论为一种量化产品从其摇篮或原料提取到坟墓或寿命终止的环境影响的方法。来自现有数据库的LCA结果以及经过同行评审的文献可以对环境影响进行比较。本文对三种生物基聚合物,聚乳酸(PLA),聚羟基链烷酸酯(PHA)和热塑性淀粉(TPS)与五种常见的石油衍生聚合物的标准数据库结果进行了比较。文献表明,相对于石油基塑料,来自相对较新行业的生物聚合物显示出相似的影响。本文回顾的研究主要集中在全球变暖潜能(GWP)和化石资源枯竭的问题上,而在很大程度上忽略了其他环境影响,其中一些因素导致了环境取舍。所审查的研究在评估范围上也有很大差异。包括寿命终止(EOL)在内的研究报告,其GWP结果要比那些将树脂或颗粒生产范围限于有限的研究高得多。在LCA中包含EOL可为生物聚合物提供更全面的结果,但同时会带来更多的不确定性和可变性。几乎没有关于不同处置方式的影响的生命周期数据,因此对于生物聚合物的未来可持续性评估而言,包括准确的生命周期终止影响至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号