首页> 外文期刊>Polymer Degradation and Stability >Mass spectrometry detection versus flame ionisation detection in pyrolysis-gas chromatography: spurious pyrolysis peaks and possible errors in estimating relative product yields
【24h】

Mass spectrometry detection versus flame ionisation detection in pyrolysis-gas chromatography: spurious pyrolysis peaks and possible errors in estimating relative product yields

机译:热解-气相色谱中的质谱检测与火焰电离检测:伪热解峰和估计相对产物收率时可能存在的误差

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In the first part of this paper it is demonstrated that spurious pyrolysis peaks can arise when a mass spectrometer (m.s.) is used as the detector in pyrolysis-gas chromatography (g.c.). The peaks can be of significant size, and have retention times which are com- parable with those of some genuine gaseous pyrolysis products, such as hydrogen chloride or carbon dioxide, towards which Flame Ionisation Detectors (FID) are almost totally insensitive. If the spurious peaks were mistakenly taken as pyrolysis products they would be associated with unusual kinetics, and an activation energy more commensurate with adsorption than thermal degradation (23 kJ mol~(-1)). The spurious peaks are shown to consist of a higher concentration of the known impurities (principally air gases) which are present in the cylinder of helium carrier gas. It is also demonstrated that the phenomenon which causes the peaks occurs at the head of the chromatography column, where the pyrolysis unit is situated. The results indicate that desorption of the impurity gases from the filament when it is fired, although occurring, is not the factor principally responsible for the spurious peaks. The major factor is the preferential expansion and back-diffusion of the helium from the pyrolysis chamber when the filament is fired. This leaves a preponderance of impurity gases in the chamber, which are pushed into the chromatography column as a slug when the filament is switched off. The mass spectrometer then records this change of ratio of carrier gas and impurity gases as a peak. This understanding of the phenomeno
机译:在本文的第一部分中,证明了当质谱仪(m.s.)被用作热解气相色谱仪(g.c.)的检测器时,可能会出现伪热解峰。峰的大小可能很大,并且保留时间与某些真正的气态热解产物(例如氯化氢或二氧化碳)的保留时间相比,火焰离子检测器(FID)几乎完全不敏感。如果将虚假峰误认为是热解产物,则它们将具有异常的动力学特性,并且活化能与吸附的比要比热降解的更合适(23 kJ mol〜(-1))。杂散峰显示为由氦载气钢瓶中存在的较高浓度的已知杂质(主要是空气)组成。还证明了引起峰的现象发生在热解单元所在的色谱柱的顶部。结果表明,尽管发生了细丝燃烧,但杂质气体从细丝上的脱附不是造成假峰值的主要因素。主要因素是细丝燃烧时氦从热解室中的优先膨胀和向后扩散。这会在腔室中留下大量杂质气体,当灯丝关闭时,这些杂质气体会以块状的形式被推入色谱柱。然后,质谱仪将载气和杂质气体比率的这种变化记录为一个峰值。对现象的这种理解

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号