首页> 外文期刊>Policy sciences >Policy learning and the public inquiry
【24h】

Policy learning and the public inquiry

机译:政策学习与公众咨询

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Can public inquiries learn lessons in ways which can reduce the likelihood of future failure? Political science research has consistently stated that the answer to this question should be an emphatic no and defined the public inquiry as an ineffectual lesson-learning mechanism. This article, however, contends that this conventional wisdom needs to be revisited. Drawing upon policy learning research for its theory, and 100 interviews across four international cases for its evidence, this article returns to the question above and finds that inquiries regularly produce instrumental' and cognitive organisational' forms of learning, which propel substantive reform agendas. By contrasting these outcomes against the types of learning that inquiries struggle to produce, the article delivers a nuanced evaluation that indicates that we need to reconsider what we think we know about these important institutions.
机译:公众咨询可以以减少未来失败的可能性的方式来吸取教训吗?政治科学研究一直一致认为,对这一问题的回答应该是“否”,并将公众调查定义为无效的课程学习机制。但是,本文认为,这种传统观念需要重新审视。本文以政策学习研究为理论基础,并在四个国际案例中进行了100次访谈,以证明其依据,发现上述问题经常会产生工具性和认知性组织形式的学习形式,从而推动实质性的改革议程。通过将这些结果与查询难以产生的学习类型进行对比,本文进行了细微的评估,表明我们需要重新考虑我们对这些重要机构的了解。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Policy sciences》 |2019年第3期|397-417|共21页
  • 作者

    Stark Alastair;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Queensland, Sch Polit Sci & Int Studies, St Lucia Campus,Bldg 39a, Brisbane, Qld 4172, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Policy learning; Public inquiry; Post-crisis reform;

    机译:政策学习;公开探究;危机后改革;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:28:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号