首页> 外文期刊>Policing >Managing tacit investigative knowledge: measuring 'investigative thinking styles'
【24h】

Managing tacit investigative knowledge: measuring 'investigative thinking styles'

机译:管理默认调查知识:衡量“调查思维方式”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to produce a framework and instrument that can be used to improve the management of tacit investigative knowledge in policing agencies based upon Dean's (2000) theory of criminal investigation. Design/methodology/approach - The paper describes the development and large-scale test of a psychometric scale with a large sample of detectives from the New South Wales Police Force, Western Australia Police, Tasmania Police, Victoria Police and Singapore Police Force. The purpose of the scale is to quantitatively measure the extent to which investigative police adhere to Dean's (2000) four investigative "thinking styles". Findings - The research produced further empirical evidence of Dean's (2000) theory, but also indicated areas where the scale and theory required readjustment and re-conceptualisation. Research limitations/implications - Future research should conduct further large-scale tests of a revised instrument, which incorporates these changes. In particular, the potential overlap between Dean's (2000) thinking style constructs and other cognitive, psychological and even physiological traits demands further consideration before the instrument can be validated. Practical implications - Once a robust, valid and reliable instrument is constructed, it may be used to map the tacit investigative knowledge that exists in police agencies and thus, inform the management of that knowledge and the experts who hold it. Originality/value - This research contributes to the current literature on knowledge management approaches in policing, with a particular focus on the management of tacit investigative knowledge. It also further extends the work of Dean (2000) and his colleagues (Dean et al, 2006, 2007, 2008a, b; Dean and Gottschalk, 2007; Dean and Staines, 2011) in empirically validating Dean's (2000) theory of criminal investigation.
机译:目的-这项研究的目的是基于Dean(2000)的刑事调查理论,提供一种可用于改善警务机关中默契调查知识管理的框架和工具。设计/方法/方法-本文描述了心理测量学规模的发展和大规模测试,其中包括来自新南威尔士州警察局,西澳大利亚州警察,塔斯马尼亚州警察局,维多利亚州警察局和新加坡警察局的大量侦探。该量表的目的是定量衡量调查警察遵守Dean(2000)的四种调查“思维方式”的程度。研究结果-该研究进一步提供了Dean(2000)理论的经验证据,但也指出了规模和理论需要重新调整和重新概念化的领域。研究的局限性/含意-未来的研究应对修订后的仪器进行进一步的大规模测试,其中应包含这些变化。特别是,Dean(2000)的思维方式构造与其他认知,心理甚至生理特征之间的潜在重叠需要在验证该仪器之前进一步考虑。实际意义-构建强大,有效和可靠的工具后,可将其用于绘制警察机构中隐含的调查知识,从而将其告知管理人员和掌握该知识的专家。原创性/价值-这项研究为有关警务领域知识管理方法的最新文献做出了贡献,尤其着重于隐性调查知识的管理。它还进一步扩展了Dean(2000)及其同事(Dean等,2006、2007、2008a,b; Dean和Gottschalk,2007; Dean和Staines,2011)的工作,以经验验证了Dean(2000)的刑事调查理论。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号