...
首页> 外文期刊>Polar Record >Through the lens of the polar years: changing characteristics of polar research in historical perspective
【24h】

Through the lens of the polar years: changing characteristics of polar research in historical perspective

机译:透过极地的镜头:历史视角下极地研究的变化特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The four polar years are used as windows for highlighting changes in the character of polar research over the past 125 years. The approach taken may be seen as one of an archaeology of knowledge. As such it fixes on four separate strata in the history of science and seeks to lay bare distinctive features in each of these. To simplify, the focus is selective, mainly presenting three types of aspect for each year. The first is the character of the instruments and research technologies employed in each, and the second is the kinds of problems tackled, while the third is the associated view or ideal of science that stands out. The latter aspect has to do with epistemology. The paper suggests that whereas work during the first International Polar Year (IPY) reflected an empirical inductivist philosophy of science, during the second IPY a mix of problem oriented, and hypothesis driven, approaches existed alongside inductivism. By the time of the International Geophysical Year (IGY) the theoretical foundations of polar research had grown stronger and much of the focus had shifted to larger scale geophysical processes. Finally, today's ambition to develop an integrated Earth system science reflects an ideal that is systemic, constructivist and predictive. Such epistemological features are evident in some of the most advanced forms of computer aided analysis of Arctic and Antarctic processes, as well as in visualisation methodologies used to interpret and present data, concepts, models and theories. This latest approach is evident in some of the planning and agenda setting documents generated under the auspices of the current IPY.
机译:极地的四个年份被用作强调过去125年极地研究特征变化的窗口。所采取的方法可以被视为知识的考古学之一。因此,它固定在科学史上的四个不同的层次上,并试图在每个层次上都展现出鲜明的特色。为简化起见,重点是选择性的,每年主要介绍三种类型的方面。第一个是每种仪器和研究技术的特点,第二个是要解决的问题,第三个是与之相关的观点或突出的科学理想。后一个方面与认识论有关。该论文表明,尽管在第一国际极地年(IPY)期间的工作反映了经验主义的归纳主义科学哲学,但是在第二个IPY期间,却结合了问题导向和假设驱动的方法,而归纳主义则与之并存。到国际地球物理年(IGY)时,极地研究的理论基础已经变得更加牢固,并且许多重点已经转移到了更大规模的地球物理过程上。最后,当今发展综合地球系统科学的雄心反映了一种系统的,建构主义的和可预测的理想。在一些最先进的北极和南极过程计算机辅助分析形式以及用于解释和呈现数据,概念,模型和理论的可视化方法中,这种认识论特征显而易见。在当前IPY的主持下产生的一些计划和议程设置文件中,这种最新方法显而易见。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Polar Record》 |2009年第235期|313-336|共24页
  • 作者

    Aant Elzinga;

  • 作者单位

    Department of History of Ideas and Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号