...
首页> 外文期刊>Electric Utility Week >Court hears dispute over utilities being freed from new PURPA contracts in four markets
【24h】

Court hears dispute over utilities being freed from new PURPA contracts in four markets

机译:法院听取有关四个市场中公用事业免于新的PURPA合同的争议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The American Forest & Paper Association made its case in federal court last week against the idea that utilities in the four most-developed power markets can be freed of the obligation to sign more contracts for power from cogeneration operations and small generators above 20 MW in size. AFPA told the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission should have been willing to consider evidence that regional transmission organizations are too dominated by their utilities and are not truly competitive for long-term power sales. Utilities have long chafed at the obligation to buy power from qualifying facilities, or QFs, under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978. But under authority of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, FERC decided in 2006 to allow utilities to avoid additional PURPA contracts in the PJM Interconnection, ISO New England, the New York Independent System Operator and the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator. These RTOs have Day-2 markets, with not only auction-based real-time markets but also day-ahead markets.
机译:美国森林与造纸协会上周在联邦法院提起了诉讼,反对这样的想法,即四个最发达的电力市场中的公用事业可以免除签订更多来自热电联产运营和20兆瓦以上小型发电机的电力合同的义务。 。 AFPA告诉美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院,联邦能源监管委员会本应愿意考虑证据,证明区域输电组织太受其公用事业的支配,并且在长期电力销售方面没有真正的竞争力。公用事业长期以来一直对根据1978年《公用事业管理政策法案》从合格设施或QF购买电力的义务感到不满。但是,根据2005年《能源政策法案》的授权,FERC在2006年决定允许公用事业避免签订额外的PURPA合同在PJM互连部门,新英格兰ISO,纽约独立系统运营商和中西部独立传输系统运营商中任职。这些RTO具有Day-2市场,不仅有基于拍卖的实时市场,而且还有日前市场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号