...
首页> 外文期刊>Electric Utility Week >Co-op Argues Against Sierra Club Escaping Suit Over Blocking Of Aid For Coal-fired Plants
【24h】

Co-op Argues Against Sierra Club Escaping Suit Over Blocking Of Aid For Coal-fired Plants

机译:合作社争辩说,塞拉俱乐部为阻止燃煤电厂的援助而逃脱诉讼

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Sierra Club is asking to be excused as a defendant in a lawsuit over federal support for coal-fired power plants, but plaintiff East Texas Electric Cooperative is arguing that the activist group's aggressive advocacy and litigation policies tie it to a suspension of federal financial assistance for such generators. The primary target of the ETEC lawsuit, in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, is the Rural Utilities Service, which has halted assistance to rural electric utilities wanting to participate in development of coal-fired power plants. RUS has said it is "not currently authorized to provide financing for baseload generation." But ETEC has told the court that RUS violated the Administrative Procedure Act when it refused to act on ETEC applications for loans to buy stakes in two generator projects in Arkansas. For those projects - Plum Point, currently under construction, and John W. Turk, awaiting construction clearance - RUS had earlier agreed that there were no procedural impediments to acting on ETEC's requests, the plaintiff said.
机译:塞拉俱乐部(Sierra Club)被要求在联邦政府对燃煤电厂的支持诉讼中被辩护为被告,但原告东德克萨斯电力合作社(East Texas Electric Cooperative)辩称,该激进组织的激进倡导和诉讼政策将其与联邦财政援助中止相关联对于这样的发电机。 ETEC诉讼的主要目标是在美国德克萨斯州东区地方法院进行的“农村公用事业服务”计划,该计划已停止为希望参与燃煤电厂开发的农村电力公用事业提供援助。 RUS表示,“目前尚未获得为基础负荷生成提供资金的授权”。但是ETEC告诉法院,当RUS拒绝就ETEC的贷款申请购买阿肯色州两个发电机项目的股份时,违反了《行政程序法》。原告说,对于那些正在建设中的Plum Point项目和正在等待施工许可的John W. Turk项目,RUS早些时候已经同意在ETEC的要求下采取行动没有程序上的障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号