...
首页> 外文期刊>Platts Electric Utility Week >FeRC’s demand response compensation proposal stirring continuing controversy
【24h】

FeRC’s demand response compensation proposal stirring continuing controversy

机译:FeRC的需求响应补偿提案引发了持续的争议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A proposal by federal energy regulators to pay demand nresponse providers the full locational marginal price for electric-nity is proving to be a contentious one, with many generators nopposing the idea and others saying DR should be compensated nlike any other resource.nThe Electric Power Supply Association issued a detailed nresponse last week to comments filed in the Federal Energy nRegulatory Commission’s proceeding on its proposed rule for ncompensation of demand response providers bidding into norganized wholesale energy markets. FERC proposed that DR nresources receive the full locational marginal price — the market nprice for electricity at a certain place on the grid. nAt issue is whether one megawatt of demand response is nequal to one megawatt of electricity, a premise some say ignores nthe fact that demand response providers enjoy avoided costs by nnot using the power and then would be double-compensated if nthey received direct payment for the power not used. nThese critics argue DR providers should not receive the full nLMP, but some sort of offset from LMP.
机译:联邦能源监管机构提出的向需求响应者支付电价的全部边际电价的提议被证明是有争议的提议,许多发电商都反对这种想法,其他人则表示应像其他任何资源一样对DR进行补偿。协会上周对联邦能源n监管委员会在程序上提出的评论进行了详细的回应,该评论提出了对需求回应提供者对无组织批发能源市场进行竞标的拟议补偿规则。 FERC建议DR nresources获得全部的位置边际价格-电网中某个位置的电力市场价格。问题在于1兆瓦的需求响应是否等于1兆瓦的电力,一个前提是有人忽略了这样一个事实,即需求响应提供者不使用电源而享受了避免的成本,然后如果他们直接收到了电力的付款就将得到双倍补偿。电源未使用。这些批评家认为,灾难恢复提供商不应接收完整的nLMP,而应从LMP中获得某种补偿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号