首页> 外文期刊>Plant and Soil >Grassland responses to grazing: effects of grazing intensity and management system in an Inner Mongolian steppe ecosystem
【24h】

Grassland responses to grazing: effects of grazing intensity and management system in an Inner Mongolian steppe ecosystem

机译:草原对放牧的反应:内蒙古草原生态系统中放牧强度和管理系统的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The major aims of this study were, firstly, to analyse the grazing-induced steppe degradation process and, secondly, to identify an efficient and sustainable grazing management system for the widely degraded Inner Mongolian typical steppe ecosystem. From 2005–2008 a grazing experiment was conducted to compare two grazing management systems, the Mixed System (MS) and the Traditional System (TS), along a gradient of seven grazing intensities, i.e. ungrazed (GI0), very-light (GI1), light (GI2), light-moderate (GI3), moderate (GI4), heavy (GI5), and very-heavy (GI6). Each grazing intensity treatment was considered a production unit comprising two adjacent plots, one for hay-making (single-cut system) and one for grazing. Hay-making and grazing alternated annually in the MS, while in the TS the same plots were used either for hay-making or for grazing. Effects of management system, grazing intensity, and year on end-of-season standing biomass (ESSB), aboveground net primary production (ANPP), relative difference in ANPP between 2005 and 2008 (ANPPDiff), relative growth rate (RGR), and sward characteristics (litter accumulation, soil coverage) were analysed. Litter accumulation of production units was affected by grazing intensity (P < 0.001) and decreased from GI0 to GI6 by 83%. Correspondingly, soil coverage decreased (P < 0.001) from GI0 to GI6 by 43%, indicating an increased vulnerability to soil erosion. We found varying compensatory growth responses to grazing intensity among years, probably because of temporal variability in precipitation. The ability of plants to partially compensate for grazing damage was enhanced in years of greater seasonal precipitation. The ANPP of production units was negatively affected by grazing intensity and decreased from GI0 to GI6 by 37, 30, and 55% in 2006 (P < 0.01), 2007 (P < 0.05), and 2008 (P < 0.001), respectively. The effect of management system × grazing intensity interaction on ANPP (P < 0.05) and ANPPDiff (P < 0.05) suggested greater grazing resilience of the MS as compared to the TS at GI3 to GI6.
机译:这项研究的主要目的是,首先,分析由放牧引起的草原退化过程,其次,为广泛退化的内蒙古典型草原生态系统确定有效和可持续的放牧管理系统。从2005年至2008年,我们进行了放牧实验,比较了七个放牧管理系统(混合系统(MS)和传统系统(TS))沿七个放牧强度的梯度,即未草化(GI0),极轻(GI1) ,轻(GI2),轻度(GI3),中度(GI4),重(GI5)和非常重(GI6)。每种放牧强度处理均被视为一个生产单元,包括两个相邻的地块,一个用于制干草(单割系统),另一个用于放牧。在MS,制干草和放牧每年交替进行,而在TS中,相同的土地用于制干草或放牧。管理系统,放牧强度和年份对季末站立生物量(ESSB),地上净初级生产量(ANPP),2005年至2008年之间的ANPP相对差异(ANPP Diff )的影响,分析了相对生长率(RGR)和草皮特征(凋落物堆积,土壤覆盖率)。放牧强度影响了生产单位的凋落物积累(P <0.001),从GI0到GI6降低了83%。相应地,土壤覆盖率从GI0下降到GI6,降低了(P <0.001)43%,表明对土壤侵蚀的脆弱性增加了。我们发现不同年份对放牧强度的代偿性增长响应不同,这可能是由于降水的时间变化所致。随着季节降水的增加,植物部分补偿放牧损害的能力得到增强。生产单位的ANPP受到放牧强度的不利影响,2006年(P <0.01),2007年(P <0.05)和2008年(P <0.001)分别从GI0降低到GI6的37%,30%和55%。管理系统×放牧强度相互作用对ANPP(P <0.05)和ANPP Diff (P <0.05)的影响表明,与GI3到GI6的TS相比,MS的更强的放牧弹性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号