首页> 外文期刊>Plant Ecology & Diversity >Liana regeneration in secondary and primary forests of central Amazonia
【24h】

Liana regeneration in secondary and primary forests of central Amazonia

机译:亚马孙中部次生林和原始林的藤本植物更新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Lianas are considered to be particularly abundant in tropical forests after disturbance; however, information on their regeneration by seedlings, saplings, and sprouts is scarce. Aim: We assessed how primary and secondary forest types with different land use history are related to the density and diversity of liana regeneration. Methods: Liana regeneration (≤ 1.7 m in length) was identified and counted in primary and secondary forest plots in Amazonia, near Manaus, Brazil. The primary forest was non-inundated evergreen tropical lowland forest. Secondary forest types were Vismia (on land formerly clear felled, used for pasture and intensively burned) and Cecropia (on land formerly clear felled, no pasture usage nor intensive fires), with distances between 0.03 and 1.2 km to the primary forest edge. Results: The density of woody regeneration (trees, lianas, palms and shrubs) was 50% lower in the secondary forests than in the primary forest. The share of lianas of woody regeneration (10-13%) hardly differed among forest types. Liana species richness per plot was highest in the primary forest and lowest in the Vismia forest. Accumulated species richness in the Cecropia forest was similar to that in the primary forest. With increasing distance from the primary forest, species richness and the proportion of lianas of woody regeneration decreased. Conclusion: Our results indicate that secondary forest type/land use history influenced liana regeneration diversity but not density. Distance to primary forest influenced both.View full textDownload full textKeywordsliana density, liana diversity, liana seedlings, sprouts, terra firme, tropical forestRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2010.484555
机译:背景:藤本植物在受到干扰后被认为在热带森林中尤为丰富。然而,关于通过幼苗,幼树和新芽再生它们的信息很少。目的:我们评估了不同土地利用历史的原始和次生森林类型与藤本植物更新的密度和多样性之间的关系。方法:藤本植物再生(长度≥1.7 m)已确定并计数在巴西马瑙斯附近的亚马逊地区的一级和二级森林中。主要森林是未淹没的常绿热带低地森林。次生林类型为Vismia(在原先被砍伐的土地上,用于牧场和密集燃烧的土地)和Cecropia(在原先被砍伐的土地上,没有牧场的使用或烈火),与原始森林边缘的距离在0.03至1.2 km之间。结果:次生林木本生更新(树木,藤本植物,棕榈和灌木)的密度比原生林低50%。森林类型中木质更新的藤本植物的比例(10-13%)几乎没有差异。每个样地的藤本植物物种丰富度在原始森林中最高,在Vismia森林中最低。切克拉皮亚森林中的累积物种丰富度与原始森林中相似。随着与原始森林距离的增加,物种丰富度和木质更新藤本植物的比例下降。结论:我们的结果表明,次生林类型/土地利用历史影响藤本植物的再生多样性,但不影响密度。到原始森林的距离都对两者都有影响。查看全文下载全文,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布编号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2010.484555

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号