首页> 外文期刊>Physical Therapy >Reproducibility of Maximal and Submaximal Exercise Testing in 'Normal Ambulatory' and 'Community Ambulatory' Children and Adolescents With Spina Bifida: Which Is Best for the Evaluation and Application of Exercise Training?
【24h】

Reproducibility of Maximal and Submaximal Exercise Testing in 'Normal Ambulatory' and 'Community Ambulatory' Children and Adolescents With Spina Bifida: Which Is Best for the Evaluation and Application of Exercise Training?

机译:在“正常门诊”和“社区门诊”儿童和青少年中,脊柱裂的最大和次最大运动测试的重现性:哪种运动训练的评估和应用最佳?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With emerging interest in exercise and lifestyle interventions for children and adolescents with spina bifida, there is a need for appropriate measurements in exercise testing. The purpose of this study was to assess both reliability and agreement of maximal and submaximal exercise measures in "normal ambulatory" and "community ambulatory" children and adolescents with spina bifida. This was a reproducibility study. Twenty-three children and adolescents with spina bifida (10 normal ambulatory and 13 community ambulatory) participated in the study. Maximal exercise outcomes were measured using a graded treadmill test. Peak measures (peak oxygen uptake [VO^sub 2^peak], peak heart rate [HRpeak], heart rate response [HRR], and oxygen pulse) were recorded. For submaximal measures, heart rate (HR) and oxygen uptake (VO^sub 2^) at the ventilatory threshold and oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) were derived from the maximal measures. Functional performance was measured as the 6-minute walking distance and the maximal speed during the treadmill test. After checking for normality and heteroscedasticity, paired t tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and the smallest detectable difference (SDD) or the coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated. Performance measures showed good reliability and agreement. For maximal measures, acceptable ICCs were found for all measures. For submaximal measures, only HR at the ventilatory threshold showed an ICC of less than .80. Agreement showed a CV of less than 10% for all measures, except for VO^sub 2^ at the ventilatory threshold, HRR, and OUES. Limitations of the study include missing data due to equipment failure. Furthermore, the outcomes were limited to normal ambulatory and community ambulatory children and adolescents with spina bifida. Both maximal and submaximal measures of exercise testing can be used for discriminative purposes in ambulatory children and adolescents with spina bifida. For evaluative purposes, HR measures are superior to VO^sub 2^ measures, while taking into account the individual variation of 5% to 8%. The SDD was 0.5 km/h for peak speed and 36.3 m for 6-minute walking distance. Heart rate response, oxygen pulse, and OUES are not recommended in the evaluation of exercise testing in this population.
机译:随着对脊柱裂儿童和青少年的运动和生活方式干预的兴趣日益浓厚,在运动测试中需要进行适当的测量。这项研究的目的是评估脊柱裂的“正常非卧床”和“社区非卧床”儿童和青少年的最大运动量和次最大运动量的可靠性和一致性。这是一项可重复性研究。二十三名患有脊柱裂的儿童和青少年(十名正常门诊和十三名社区门诊)参加了这项研究。使用分级跑步机测试可测量最大运动结果。记录峰值测量值(峰值摄氧量[VO ^ sub 2 ^ peak],峰值心率[HRpeak],心率响应[HRR]和氧气脉冲)。对于次最大量度,从最大量度得出通气阈值下的心率(HR)和摄氧量(VO ^ sub 2 ^)和摄氧量效率斜率(OUES)。在跑步机测试过程中,以6分钟的步行距离和最大速度来衡量功能性能。在检查了正态性和异方差性之后,计算了配对t检验,组内相关系数(ICC)和最小可检测差异(SDD)或变异系数(CV)。绩效指标显示出良好的可靠性和一致性。对于最大的措施,找到所有措施可接受的ICC。对于次最大量度,仅在通气阈值处的HR显示ICC小于.80。协议显示,除通气阈值,HRR和OUES处的VO ^ sub 2 ^外,所有量度的CV均小于10%。研究的局限性包括由于设备故障而导致的数据丢失。此外,结果仅限于脊柱裂的正常非卧床和社区非卧床儿童和青少年。运动测试的最大和次最大量度都可用于区分活动性儿童和青少年脊柱裂的青少年。出于评估目的,考虑到5%到8%的个体差异,HR度量优于VO ^ sub 2 ^度量。最高速度时的SDD为0.5 km / h,步行6分钟时的SDD为36.3 m。在此人群的运动测试评估中,不建议心率响应,氧气脉冲和OUES。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Physical Therapy》 |2011年第2期|p.267-276|共10页
  • 作者单位

    J.F. de Groot, PT, MSc, is Researcher, Research Group Lifestyle and Health, University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, the Netherlands, and Department of Pediatric Physical Therapy and Exercise Physiology, Child Development and Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room kb.02.056.0. PO Box 85090, 3508 AB Utrecht, the Netherlands. Address all correspondence to Mrs de Groot at: janke.degroot@hu.nl.T. Takken, PhD, is Medical Physiologist, Department of Pediatric Physical Therapy and Exercise Physiology, Child Development and Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht.R.H.J.M. Gooskens, PhD, is Medical Doctor, Department of Child Neurology, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht.M.A.G.C. Schoenmakers, PhD, is Physical Therapist, Child Development and Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht.M. Wubbels is Physical Therapist, School of Physical Therapy, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht.L. Vanhees, PhD, is Professor, Research Group Lifestyle and Health, University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, the Netherlands, and Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.P.J.M. Helders, PhD, is Professor, Department of Pediatric Physical Therapy and Exercise Physiology, Child Development and Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号