...
首页> 外文期刊>Physical review >Erratum: Light-induced hyperfine ~(69)Ga shifts in semi-insulating GaAs observed by optically polarized NMR [Phys. Rev. B 74, 153201 (2006)]
【24h】

Erratum: Light-induced hyperfine ~(69)Ga shifts in semi-insulating GaAs observed by optically polarized NMR [Phys. Rev. B 74, 153201 (2006)]

机译:勘误:通过光偏振NMR观察到的半绝缘GaAs中光诱导的超精细〜(69)Ga位移[Phys。 B 74,153201(2006)版]

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

On page 2 of this paper, we depicted in Fig. 2 a fit of the ~(69)Ga OPNMR shift offset with respect to τ_L irradiation time, through numerical analysis of Eq. (3). We found an error in the code, and with the parameters presented in the paper, there no longer is a good match to the experimental data.rnWe depict below the corrected plot. What is shown are two values for isotropic nuclear spin diffusion D of 2300 A2/sec (as reported in the original paper) and 0 A2/sec. The observed data fall between these two extreme values. The shape of the shift dependence on τ_L is still maintained, suggesting that other value(s) of D may be appropriate. Our conclusions for the paper must be modified slightly. In the absence of a good fit to the experimental data, the values of the electron spin polarization cannot be determined. These values were reported on page 3 as -0.10 for σ~+ and 0.14 for σ~- light. In our concluding paragraph we stated: "We have presented a quantitative model of OPNMR that utilizes the hyperfine interaction, between localized electrons and surrounding nuclei, and nuclear spin diffusion." This statement is no longer correct. However, the other conclusions regarding the origin and the helicity dependence of the hyperfine shift still hold.rnThe authors would like to thank Lee Sobotka for helpful discussions.
机译:在本文的第2页上,我们通过等式的数值分析,在图2中描绘了〜(69)Ga OPNMR位移偏移相对于τ_L照射时间的拟合。 (3)。我们发现代码中有错误,并且使用本文提供的参数,与实验数据不再有很好的匹配。显示的是各向同性核自旋扩散D的两个值,分别为2300 A2 / sec(如原始论文所述)和0 A2 / sec。观察到的数据介于这两个极值之间。仍然保持对τ_L的移位依赖性,这表明D的其他值可能是合适的。我们对本文的结论必须稍作修改。在缺乏对实验数据的良好拟合的情况下,无法确定电子自旋极化值。这些值在第3页上报告为σ〜+为-0.10,σ〜-light为0.14。在我们的最后一段中,我们说:“我们已经提出了一种OPNMR定量模型,该模型利用了局部电子与周围核之间的超精细相互作用以及核自旋扩散。”此声明不再正确。但是,关于超精细位移的起源和螺旋度依赖性的其他结论仍然成立。作者要感谢Lee Sobotka的有益讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号