...
首页> 外文期刊>Physical review letters >Erratum: Nuclear Emissions during Self-Nucleated Acoustic Cavitation [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96,034301 (2006)]
【24h】

Erratum: Nuclear Emissions during Self-Nucleated Acoustic Cavitation [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96,034301 (2006)]

机译:勘误:自核声空化过程中的核辐射[物理学报牧师96,034301(2006)]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In Fig. 4, the "Diff." column should read 996, not 966, for the row relating the difference in counts with cavitation on versus off for DBen. In Fig. 5, the aggregate change value for DBUN should be 8 SD, not 14 SD. This aspect was previously pointed out during 2006 in our published Reply to Lipson Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 149402 (2006). On page 2, column 1, last paragraph, the sentence concerning the ~400% increase in neutron and the ~100% increase of gammas, should read "~300% increase (× 4) in neutron and ~100% increase of gammas." The factor of~4 increase of neutron-window counts over background was incorrectly translated as ~400% instead of as ~300%. In Figs. 10,11,12, and 13 of the supplemental information (see Ref. [9] of the original Letter), the arrows pointing to the proton-recoil edge (PRE) should all be pointing to channel ~120 (as indicated in Fig. 4 of the main Letter Phys. Rev. Lett. 96,034301 (2006)) and not to other channels between 120 and 130. A slight shift occurred during figure preparation for the supplement.
机译:在图4中,“差异”。对于DBen,与空化打开或关闭的计数差有关的行,该列应显示为996,而不是966。在图5中,DBUN的总变化值应为8 SD,而不是14 SD。我们在2006年出版的《对Lipson Phys的回复》中指出了这一方面。牧师97,149402(2006)。在第2页第1栏最后一段中,有关中子〜400%增长和伽马〜100%增长的句子应为“中子~~ 300%增长(×4)和伽马〜100%增长”。 ”中子窗口数相对于本底增加〜4的因子被错误地转换为〜400%,而不是〜300%。在图。在补充信息的10、11、12和13中(请参阅原始信函的参考文献[9]),指向质子反冲边缘(PRE)的箭头应全部指向〜120通道(如图所示)。 (Letter Phys。Rev. Lett。96,034301(2006))的第4章),而不是传送到120至130之间的其他频道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号