首页> 外文期刊>Photosynthetica >Relationship between specific leaf area, leaf thickness, leaf water content and SPAD-502 readings in six Amazonian tree species
【24h】

Relationship between specific leaf area, leaf thickness, leaf water content and SPAD-502 readings in six Amazonian tree species

机译:六个亚马逊树种的比叶面积,叶片厚度,叶片含水量与SPAD-502读数之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this work was to assess the effect of leaf thickness, leaf succulence (LS), specific leaf area (SLA), specific leaf mass (Ws) and leaf water content (LWC) on chlorophyll (Chl) meter values in six Amazonian tree species (Carapa guianensis, Ceiba pentandra, Cynometra spruceana, Pithecolobium inaequale, Scleronema micranthum and Swietenia macrophylla). We also tested the accuracy of a general calibration equation to convert Minolta Chl meter (SPAD-502) readings into absolute Chl content. On average, SPAD values (x) increased with fresh leaf thickness (FLT [μm] = 153.9 + 0.98 x, r 2 = 0.06**), dry leaf thickness (DLT [μm] = 49.50 + 1.28 x, r 2 = 0.16**), specific leaf mass (Ws [g (DM) m−2] = 6.73 + 1.31 x, r 2 = 0.43**), and leaf succulence (LS [g(FM)] m−2 = 94.2 + 1.58 x, r 2 = 0.19**). However, a negative relationship was found between SPAD values and either specific leaf area [SLA (m2 kg−1) = 35.1 − 0.37 x, r 2 = 0.38**] or the leaf water content (LWC [%]= 80.0 − 0.42 x, r 2 = 0.58**). Leaf Chl contents predicted by the general calibration equation significantly differed (p<0.01) from those estimated by species-specific calibration equations. We conclude that to improve the accuracy of the SPAD-502 leaf thickness and LWC should be taken into account when calibration equations are to be obtained to convert SPAD values into absolute Chl content.
机译:这项工作的目的是评估叶片厚度,叶片多汁(L S ),比叶面积(SLA),比叶质量(W s )和六种亚马逊树种(Carapa guianensis,Ceiba pentandra,Cynometra spruceana,Pithecolobium inaequale,Scleronema micranthum和Swietenia macrophylla)叶绿素(Chl)米值上的叶片含水量(LWC)。我们还测试了将美能达Chl仪(SPAD-502)读数转换成绝对Chl含量的通用校准方程式的准确性。平均而言,SPAD值(x)随着鲜叶厚度(FLT [μm] = 153.9 + 0.98 x,r 2 = 0.06 **),干叶厚度(DLT [μm] = 49.50 + 1.28 x,r 2 = 0.16 **),比叶质量(W s [g(DM)m -2 ] = 6.73 + 1.31 x,r 2 = 0.43 **)和叶子多汁(L S [g(FM)] m -2 = 94.2 + 1.58 x,r 2 = 0.19 **)。但是,SPAD值与任一特定叶面积[SLA(m 2 kg -1 ] = 35.1 − 0.37 x,r 2 < / sup> = 0.38 **]或叶片含水量(LWC [%] = 80.0-0.42 x,r 2 = 0.58 **)。通过一般校准方程预测的叶片Chl含量与通过物种特定校准方程估计的叶片Chl含量显着不同(p <0.01)。我们得出的结论是,要获得SPAD的校准方程以将SPAD值转换为绝对Chl含量时,应考虑提高SPAD-502叶片厚度和LWC的精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号