...
首页> 外文期刊>Photonic network communications >Design and performance comparison of multiple-token based MAC protocols for optical burst switched ring networks
【24h】

Design and performance comparison of multiple-token based MAC protocols for optical burst switched ring networks

机译:光突发交换环网中基于多令牌的MAC协议的设计和性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Optical burst switching (OBS) has been proposed as a new optical switching paradigm for the next generation Internet due to its flexibility and feasibility compared to OCS and OPS. Moreover, serving as a backbone that interconnects a number of access networks, OBS ring topologies have been a good choice for solving the current metro gap problem between core network and access network owning to its simplicity and scalability. In this paper, we provide an insight into the OBS ring network that consists of nodes using TT-TR (Tunable Transmitter-Tunable Receiver). The node architectures with TT-TR may make efficient use of network resources even though traffic pattern, such as IP traffic with self-similarity dynamically change, and can support good expandability. However, all nodes share the limited network resources. This may result in contention such as wavelength contention and transceiver contention leading to burst loss. In order to use the shared network resources fairly and efficiently as well as reducing the resource contention, we focus on the design of medium access control (MAC) protocols based on multiple tokens. Each token is allocated to one wavelength to denote the accessibility of that wavelength, i.e., once the token is captured, the corresponding wavelength can be used to transmit a burst. As tokens hold the key for using wavelengths to transmit bursts, token management including the token release time is crucial in the proposed MAC protocols. Thus, two kinds of multiple-token based MAC protocols with different token release times are proposed: token release after transmitting burst (TRTB) and token release after transmitting control header (TRTC). Each of them is classified into two schemes called TRTB/TRR and TRTB/RCA and correspondingly TRTC/TRR and TRTC/RCA. RCA stands for receive collision avoidance. The target is to increase the performance while reducing the processing overhead at each node. The performance of the TRTB and TRTC protocols are evaluated and compared in terms of queuing delay, burst loss rate, and channel utilization by OPNET simulation. The effects of various design parameters are also investigated through simulation in order to evaluate their scalability. In all the proposed schemes, tokens are just used to denote the accessibility of each wavelength. Finally, as an alternative, we also propose a new scheme based on the TRTC protocol called TRTC/CAT (collision avoidance by tokens) to avoid contention by using tokens.
机译:由于与OCS和OPS相比,光突发交换(OBS)的灵活性和可行性,已提出将其作为下一代Internet的新光交换范例。此外,OBS环形拓扑作为互连多个接入网络的骨干网,凭借其简单性和可扩展性,已经成为解决核心网络与接入网络之间当前城域差距问题的好选择。在本文中,我们提供了对OBS环形网络的见解,该网络由使用TT-TR(可调发射器-可调接收器)的节点组成。即使流量模式(例如具有自相似性的IP流量)动态变化,带有TT-TR的节点体系结构也可以有效利用网络资源,并且可以支持良好的可扩展性。但是,所有节点共享有限的网络资源。这可能导致争用,例如波长争用和收发器争用,导致突发损失。为了公平有效地使用共享的网络资源并减少资源争用,我们专注于基于多个令牌的媒体访问控制(MAC)协议的设计。将每个令牌分配给一个波长以表示该波长的可访问性,即,一旦捕获令牌,就可以使用相应的波长来传输突发。由于令牌是使用波长传输突发的关键,因此在建议的MAC协议中,包括令牌释放时间在内的令牌管理至关重要。因此,提出了两种具有不同令牌释放时间的基于多令牌的MAC协议:传输突发后的令牌释放(TRTB)和传输控制头后的令牌释放(TRTC)。它们中的每一个都分为两个方案,分别称为TRTB / TRR和TRTB / RCA,以及相应的TRTC / TRR和TRTC / RCA。 RCA代表避免碰撞。目标是在降低每个节点的处理开销的同时提高性能。通过OPNET仿真评估并比较了TRTB和TRTC协议的性能,包括排队延迟,突发丢失率和信道利用率。为了评估其可扩展性,还通过仿真研究了各种设计参数的影响。在所有提出的方案中,令牌仅用于表示每个波长的可访问性。最后,作为替代方案,我们还提出了一种基于TRTC协议的新方案,称为TRTC / CAT(令牌避免冲突),以避免使用令牌进行竞争。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号