首页> 外文期刊>Knowledge Technology & Policy >A Critique of Information Ethics
【24h】

A Critique of Information Ethics

机译:信息伦理学批判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Luciano Floridi presents Information Ethics (IE) as an alternative to traditional moral theories. IE consists of two tenets. First, reality can be interpreted at numerous, mutually consistent levels of abstraction, the highest of which is information. This level, unlike the others, applies to all of reality. Second, everything, insofar as it is an information object, has some degree of intrinsic value and hence moral dignity. I criticize IE, arguing that Floridi fails to show that the moral community should be expanded beyond beings capable of suffering or having preferences. Next, I look at Floridi's extended case against consequentialism generally and utilitarianism in particular. I try to show that his criticisms are flawed. Third, I argue that, for the most part, it is not clear what IE's practical implications are. I conclude with a critical discussion of the one area of information ethics, traditionally conceived, that Floridi has written about at length, privacy.
机译:卢西亚诺·弗洛里迪(Luciano Floridi)提出了信息伦理学(IE),以替代传统道德理论。 IE由两个原则组成。首先,可以在许多相互一致的抽象层次上解释现实,其中最高的层次是信息。与其他级别不同,此级别适用于所有现实。第二,凡是作为信息对象的事物,都具有一定程度的内在价值,因此具有道德尊严。我批评IE,他认为弗洛里迪(Floridi)无法表明道德社区应该扩展到超越能够承受苦难或具有偏好的人。接下来,我看弗洛里迪关于广义的结果主义,特别是功利主义的扩展案例。我试图证明他的批评是有缺陷的。第三,我认为,在大多数情况下,尚不清楚IE的实际含义是什么。最后,我将对弗洛里迪(Floridi)长期以来写的关于隐私的信息伦理这一传统领域进行严格的讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号