首页> 外文期刊>Perioperative Medicine >Anaerobic threshold, is it a magic number to determine fitness for surgery?
【24h】

Anaerobic threshold, is it a magic number to determine fitness for surgery?

机译:无氧阈值,是确定手术适应性的神奇数字吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to evaluate cardiac and respiratory function was pioneered as part of preoperative assessment in the mid 1990s. Surgical procedures have changed since then. The patient population may have aged; however, the physiology has remained the same. The use of an accurate physiological evaluation remains as germane today as it was then. Certainly no ‘magic’ is involved. The author recognizes that not everyone accepts the classical theories of the anaerobic threshold (AT) and that there is some discussion around lactate and exercise. The article looks at aerobic capacity as an important predictor of perioperative mortality and also looks at some aspects of CPET relative to surgical risk evaluation.
机译:1990年代中期,作为术前评估的一部分,率先使用心肺运动测试(CPET)评估心脏和呼吸功能。从那时起,手术程序发生了变化。患者人群可能已经老了;然而,生理却保持不变。如今,使用准确的生理评估仍然与当年息息相关。当然不涉及“魔术”。作者认识到,并不是每个人都接受厌氧阈值(AT)的经典理论,并且围绕乳酸和运动进行了一些讨论。这篇文章将有氧能力视为围手术期死亡率的重要预测指标,还探讨了与手术风险评估相关的CPET的某些方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号