...
首页> 外文期刊>Performance evaluation review >Comparing slotted and continuous CSMA: throughputs and fairness
【24h】

Comparing slotted and continuous CSMA: throughputs and fairness

机译:比较开槽和连续CSMA:吞吐量和公平性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Carrier-Sense Multiple-Access (CSMA) protocols form a popular class of random-access schemes for regulating node activity in wireless networks. We compare the continuous and the time-slotted versions of this protocol in the saturated regime, and show that continuous CSMA has higher aggregate throughput than the slotted protocol, but this comes at the cost of fairness, i.e., the throughput is not evenly distributed across all nodes. We then release the saturation assumption and consider a multi-hop scenario where packets are forwarded through the network and nodes may occasionally empty. We study end-to-end throughput of both continuous and slotted CSMA, and show that slotted CSMA has a higher throughput than the continuous protocol.
机译:载波侦听多路访问(CSMA)协议形成了一种流行的随机访问方案,用于调节无线网络中的节点活动。我们在饱和状态下比较了该协议的连续版本和时隙版本,并表明连续CSMA具有比时隙协议更高的总吞吐量,但这是以公平为代价的,即,吞吐量在整个应用程序中分布不均匀所有节点。然后,我们释放饱和度假设,并考虑一种多跳方案,其中数据包通过网络转发,并且节点有时可能为空。我们研究了连续CSMA和分段CSMA的端到端吞吐量,并显示了分段CSMA具有比连续协议更高的吞吐量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号