Metso Paper says Bostik has not established that Metso was compelled by an administrative order to incur costs

摘要

Metso Paper USA Inc. defended on April 6 the decision which denied Bostik Inc/s motion to dismiss Matso's §107 claim for $2 million expended to clean up PCE and/or TCE contamination on adjacent property in the Ivy Industrial Park in Clarks Summit.rnBostik has moved to appeal to the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals the decision which held that a potentially responsible party that enters into a consent order to dean up environmental damage may later bring a claim against another PRP under § 107 of CERCLA.