...
首页> 外文期刊>Pennsylvania journal of environmental litigation >Citizens group says that when prospective co-client status is recognized no waiver of attorney-client privilege occurs
【24h】

Citizens group says that when prospective co-client status is recognized no waiver of attorney-client privilege occurs

机译:公民组织说,当潜在的共同客户身份得到承认时,不会放弃律师-客户特权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Citizens Coal Council contended on March 21 that no waiver of attorney-client privilege occurs for communcations by persons seeking to be represented by the same attorney in its lawsuit with respect to litigation brought by LaBelle residents to redess pollution. (See issue of March 15,2014 Pages 5 and 14.) Matt Canestrale Contracting Inc. (MCC), owner of the LaBelle Refuse Site in Luzerne Township, Fayette County, is asking the federal court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to deny Citizens Coal Council's request in find that sharing communications subject to attorney-client privilege with co-clients or other attorneys did not waive the privilege.
机译:公民煤炭理事会(Citizens Coal Council)在3月21日争辩说,在LaBelle居民提起诉讼以减轻污染的诉讼中,寻求由同一律师代理的人的交流不会放弃律师-委托人的特权。 (请参阅2014年3月15日,第5和14页。)位于费耶特县卢泽恩镇的LaBelle垃圾处理场的所有者Matt Canestrale Contracting Inc.(MCC)要求宾夕法尼亚州西部地区的联邦法院否认公民煤炭理事会的要求是,与共同客户或其他律师共享受律师-客户特权约束的通信不会放弃该特权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号