...
首页> 外文期刊>Pennsylvania journal of environmental litigation >UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
【24h】

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

机译:美国第三审上诉法院

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future (CPF) appeals the District Court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Pittsburgh Water & Sewer Authority and the City of Pittsburgh (collectively PWSA) in connection with CPF's citizen suit for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act and Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law. CPF argues that the Magistrate Judge (1) improperly granted summary judgment on a ground not raised by PWSA, (2) erred in granting summary judgment because failure to enforce an ordinance adopted pursuant to the EPA permit for discharge of storm water run-off is an actionable violation of the permit, and (3) abused his discretion in denying CPF's motion to reconsider. For the reasons that follow, we will vacate the District Court's order granting summary judgment and remand the case to the District Court to determine whether the 2010 Ordinance was incorporated into, a condition of, or a requirement for compliance with, the Permit.
机译:宾夕法尼亚州未来公民(CPF)上诉地区法院就匹兹堡自来水和污水处理局和匹兹堡市(统称PWSA)提起简易判决,涉及CPF因涉嫌违反《清洁水法》和《宾夕法尼亚州清洁法》而提起的民事诉讼流法。 CPF辩称,地方法院法官(1)不以PWSA提出的理由不当作出简易判决,(2)作出简易判决是错误的,因为未执行根据EPA许可通过的条例来排放雨水径流是(3)滥用其酌处权拒绝中央公积金重新考虑的动议。基于以下原因,我们将撤消地方法院作出简易判决的命令,并将此案退还给地方法院,以确定是否将2010年条例纳入了许可证,条件或要求遵守许可证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号