...
首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric Surgery International >Short-term catheterization after TIP repair in distal hypospadias: who are the best candidates?
【24h】

Short-term catheterization after TIP repair in distal hypospadias: who are the best candidates?

机译:远端尿道下裂TIP修复后的短期导管插入术:谁是最佳人选?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the last decade, tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty has become the first choice of surgical technique in patients with distal hypospadias. Despite the excellent cosmetic and functional results, prolonged catheterization (7–14 days) remains the main disadvantage of the TIP repair. In this study, we investigated the outcomes of the short-term catheterization in children with distal hypospadias in order to elucidate any relationship between the length of catheterization and the patients’ age, meatal localization and postoperative complication rates. The charts of 183 patients who underwent TIP repair for distal hypospadias in two different centers were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were grouped based on their catheter removal time (before 24 h vs. after 24 h) and the toilet status of children (toilet-trained vs. in-diaper). Children who had at least 6 months of follow-up and regular office visits were included in the study group, and the results were compared to the literature as well as the subgroups were also evaluated in terms of complications and catheterization period. A total of 128 patients with 40.4 months of the mean age (6–180 months) and 22.7 months of the follow-up (6–49 months) were included in the study. For the group 1 patients (n = 99) in whom the urethral catheter was removed before 24 h, the mean age and follow-up were 33.4 months (6–150 months) and 22.3 months (6–48 months), respectively. The catheters of group 2 patients (n = 29) were removed after 24 h, and their mean age and follow-up were 64.4 months (6–180 months) and 24.2 months (6–49 months), respectively. The group 2 patients were significantly older than those of group 1 (P < 0.05). The complications, such as fistula, meatal stenosis, tube dehiscence and buried penis, were seen in 11.1% of the group 1 and 13.8% of the group 2 (11.7% in overall), showing no statistically significant difference. On the other hand, 44% of the patients (n = 56) were toilet-trained at time of surgery. Although the mean age (79 months vs. 10.4 months) and the catheter removal time (64.3% vs. 87.5% before 24 h) of this group were significantly longer than the patients in diaper (P < 0.05), no significant difference was determined in terms of complication (14.2% vs. 9.7%). TIP repair with short-term catheterization has similar outcomes to the patients who conventionally carry their stent 7–14 days. The meatal position and the toileting status of the patients are not important in the use and length of catheterization.
机译:在过去的十年中,管状切口钢板(TIP)尿道成形术已成为远端尿道下裂患者的首选手术技术。尽管具有出色的美容和功能效果,但延长导管插入时间(7-14天)仍然是TIP修复的主要缺点。在这项研究中,我们调查了远端尿道下裂儿童的短期导管插入术的结果,以阐明导管插入术的长度与患者年龄,肉质定位和术后并发症发生率之间的任何关系。回顾性分析了在两个不同中心对183例远端尿道下裂进行TIP修复的患者的病历。根据患者的导管拔除时间(24小时之前与24小时之后)和儿童的厕所状况(经过厕所训练的尿布与尿布中的尿布)对患者进行分组。研究组包括至少6个月的随访和定期办公室就诊的儿童,并将结果与​​文献进行比较,并对亚组的并发症和导管插入时间进行评估。该研究共纳入128名平均年龄为40.4个月(6-180个月)和22.7个月的随访(6-49个月)的患者。对于第1组(n = 99)在24 h之前拔除尿道导管的患者,平均年龄和随访时间分别为33.4个月(6-150个月)和22.3个月(6-48个月)。第2组患者(n = 29)的导管在24 h后拔出,其平均年龄和随访时间分别为64.4个月(6-180个月)和24.2个月(6-49个月)。第2组患者明显高于第1组(P <0.05)。在第1组中有11.1%的人患有瘘管,肉管狭窄,管裂开和阴茎隐匿等并发症,在第2组中有13.8%的人(总体占11.7%),差异无统计学意义。另一方面,有44%的患者(n = 56)在手术时接受了如厕训练。尽管该组的平均年龄(79个月vs. 10.4个月)和导管拔除时间(64.3%vs. 24.5小时前的87.5%)显着长于尿布患者(P <0.05),但差异无统计学意义。在并发症方面(分别为14.2%和9.7%)。短期导管插入术进行TIP修复的效果与常规携带支架7-14天的患者相似。在导管的使用和长度方面,患者的肉位置和上厕所状态并不重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号