...
首页> 外文期刊>PCI Journal >Authors' response
【24h】

Authors' response

机译:作者的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The authors would like to express gratitude to William Gamble for his interest and valuable feedback on "Modeling the Resistance of Precast, Prestressed Concrete Hollow-Core Slabs Exposed to Fire." The discrepancy in the paper regarding the limiting temperature on the unexposed surface is due to inconsistency in the conversion of temperature on Celsius and Fahrenheit scales (Δ℃ →Δ℉). However, the authors are aware of the fact that the critical temperature rise for the unexposed side of the slabs is 250 ℉ (139 ℃) for the average temperature and 325 ℉ (181 ℃) for tem- perature at a single point, as per ASTM-E119. Thus, temperature limits of 159 ℃ for average temperature and 201 ℃ for single-point temperature were applied in evaluating failure (fire resistance) of the slabs. It should be noted that this error does not change or affect the results presented in the paper.
机译:作者对William Gamble的兴趣和对“模拟预制,预应力混凝土空心空心板的抗火性”的兴趣和宝贵反馈表示感谢。论文中关于未暴露表面的极限温度的差异是由于摄氏温度和华氏温标(Δ℃→Δ℉)的温度转换不一致。但是,作者意识到以下事实:根据标准,板的未暴露侧的临界温度升高是平均温度为250℉(139℃),平均温度为325℉(181℃)。 ASTM-E119。因此,将平均温度为159℃,单点温度为201℃的温度极限用于评估板的破坏(耐火性)。应该注意的是,该错误不会改变或影响论文中提出的结果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《PCI Journal 》 |2015年第1期| 146-147| 共2页
  • 作者单位

    Michigan State University East Lansing, Mich;

    Michigan State University East Lansing, Mich;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号