首页> 外文期刊>Pattern recognition letters >On the discriminability of keystroke feature vectors used in fixed text keystroke authentication
【24h】

On the discriminability of keystroke feature vectors used in fixed text keystroke authentication

机译:关于固定文本按键身份验证中使用的按键特征向量的可分辨性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Heterogeneous and aggregate vectors are the two widely used feature vectors in fixed text keystroke authentication. In this paper, we address the question "Which vectors, heterogeneous, aggregate, or a combination of both, are more discriminative and why?" We accomplish this in three ways - (1) by providing an intuitive example to illustrate how aggregation of features inherently reduces discriminability; (2) by formulating "discriminability" as a non-parametric estimate of Bhattacharya distance, we show theoretically that the discriminability of a heterogeneous vector is higher than an aggregate vector; and (3) by conducting user recognition experiments using a dataset containing keystrokes from 33 users typing a 32-character reference text, we empirically validate our theoretical analysis. To compare the discriminability of heterogeneous and aggregate vectors with different combinations of keystroke features, we conduct feature selection analysis using three methods: (1) ReliefF, (2) correlation based feature selection, and (3) consistency based feature selection. Results of feature selection analysis reinforce the findings of our theoretical analysis.
机译:异构和聚合矢量是固定文本按键身份验证中两个广泛使用的特征矢量。在本文中,我们解决了以下问题:“哪个向量,异构向量,集合向量或两者的结合更具区分性,为什么?”我们通过三种方式来实现这一目标-(1)通过提供一个直观的示例来说明特征聚合如何固有地降低可辨别性; (2)通过将“可判别性”公式化为Bhattacharya距离的非参数估计,我们从理论上证明了异类向量的可辨别性高于集合向量; (3)通过使用包含33个用户键入32个字符的参考文本的击键的数据集进行用户识别实验,我们从经验上验证了我们的理论分析。为了比较具有不同击键特征组合的异构向量和集合向量的可分辨性,我们使用三种方法进行特征选择分析:(1)ReliefF,(2)基于相关特征选择和(3)基于一致性特征选择。特征选择分析的结果加强了我们理论分析的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号