首页> 外文期刊>Parliamentary Affairs >A Banana Republic? The Investigation into Electoral Fraud by the Birmingham Election Court
【24h】

A Banana Republic? The Investigation into Electoral Fraud by the Birmingham Election Court

机译:香蕉共和国?伯明翰选举法院对选举欺诈的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In 2005 an election court was held in Birmingham to determine allegations about fraud in two wards in the 2004 local elections. It found there had been fraud and corruption on a massive scale and declared the election void. The court exposed major weaknesses in the system of postal voting, which had been extended by the introduction of postal voting on demand in 2000, but without safeguards for the integrity of the electoral system at both national and local level. This article describes the proceedings of the election court against the background of the postal voting arrangements and the Birmingham context. It shows how the judgment of the court and the publicity it generated brought the issue of postal voting on to the national political agenda during the 2005 general election campaign, leading to a Government commitment to legislate.
机译:2005年,伯明翰举行了一次选举法庭,以确定在2004年地方选举中两个病房中欺诈行为的指控。它发现大规模的欺诈和腐败行为,并宣布选举无效。法院揭露了邮政投票制度的主要弱点,该弱点已在2000年通过按需引入邮政投票而得到扩展,但没有保障国家和地方各级选举制度的完整性。本文介绍了在邮政投票安排和伯明翰背景下选举法院的诉讼程序。它显示了法院的判决及其产生的宣传是如何在2005年大选期间将邮政投票问题纳入国家政治议程的,从而导致了政府对立法的承诺。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Parliamentary Affairs》 |2006年第4期|654-667|共14页
  • 作者

    John Stewart;

  • 作者单位

    Emeritus Professor at the Institute of Local Government Studies University of Birmingham.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:06:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号