首页> 外文期刊>Palliative and Supportive Care >Multiple evaluation of a hospital-based palliative care consultation team in a university hospital: Activities, patient outcome, and referring staff's view
【24h】

Multiple evaluation of a hospital-based palliative care consultation team in a university hospital: Activities, patient outcome, and referring staff's view

机译:对大学医院中基于医院的姑息治疗咨询小组的多重评估:活动,患者结果和推荐人员的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: Although the number of hospital-based palliative care consultation teams (PCCTs) is rapidly increasing in Japan, there is limited information available concerning the activities and usefulness of PCCT in the country. The aim of this study is to clarify the activities, patient outcome, and referring staff's view of an established PCCT in Japan.Method: This was a prospective study to follow patients referred to a PCCT for 28 days over a 1-year period. Patients were assessed by the Support Team Assessment Schedule–Japanese version (STAS-J) and EORTC QLQ C-30 at the time of referral and on days 7, 14, and 28. A staff survey was implemented using a questionnaire after each observation period.Results: Of 180 patients referred, 53 patients were eligible for the study. Although the median of the number of the reasons for referral was 1, the PCCT provided several kinds of support: pain management, 94%; emotional support for the patient, 49%; and emotional support for the family, 36%. On day 7 after referral, of the items of STAS-J and the EORTC QLQ C-30 subscales, only insomnia improved significant whereas “other physical symptoms” and constipation were significantly exacerbated. In the staff survey, of the 98 respondents, more than 90% considered the effect of the PCCT as “excellent” or “good” and were satisfied with the support provided.Significance of results: This study showed that the PCCT performed comprehensive assessments on referred patients and provided extra support. No patient's QOL 1 week after referral was improved with the exception of insomnia. Referring staff highly evaluated the activities of the PCCT. In the evaluation of PCCTs, further research about the variation of clinical activities of PCCTs, their applicability, and benefit is needed.
机译:目标:尽管在日本,以医院为基础的姑息治疗咨询小组(PCCT)的数量正在迅速增加,但是有关该国PCCT的活动和有效性的可用信息有限。这项研究的目的是弄清在日本建立PCCT的活动,患者结果以及转介人员的观点。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,旨在追踪在一年内转诊PCCT的患者28天。在转诊时以及第7、14和28天,通过支持小组评估时间表-日文版(STAS-J)和EORTC QLQ C-30对患者进行了评估。在每个观察期后均使用问卷调查表进行了员工调查结果:在转诊的180名患者中,有53名患者符合研究条件。尽管转诊原因总数的中位数为1,但PCCT提供了多种支持:疼痛处理率为94%;转诊原因为1。为患者提供情感支持的比例为49%;和对家庭的情感支持,占36%。转诊后第7天,在STAS-J和EORTC QLQ C-30分量表中,只有失眠明显改善,而“其他身体症状”和便秘则明显加重。在员工调查中,对98位受访者而言,超过90%的人认为PCCT的效果是“优秀”或“良好”,并且对所提供的支持感到满意。结果的意义:本研究表明PCCT对以下各项进行了综合评估转诊患者并提供额外支持。转诊1周后,除失眠外,患者的生活质量均无改善。转介人员高度评价了PCCT的活动。在PCCT的评估中,需要进一步研究PCCT的临床活动变化,其适用性和益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号