首页> 外文期刊>Pacific-Basin Finance Journal >Loan financing and investment in princeling-backed firms
【24h】

Loan financing and investment in princeling-backed firms

机译:贷款融资和普林斯支持公司的投资

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study investigates the role of princelings in Chinese listed firms. Our findings suggest that princelings ensure better access to bank loans for non-SOEs but bring no significant benefits to SOEs. Our empirical results further indicate that bank lending decisions are distorted for princeling-backed firms due to the privileges and protections they can obtain from the higher levels of the government through princelings' family ties. Moreover, we find that, due to excess long-term bank loans, princeling-backed non-SOEs tend to overinvest, which ultimately results in lower investment efficiency. Furthermore, we use the difference-in-difference method to capture the effect of the exogenous shock of the recent anti-corruption campaign in China on princelings and corporate finance and investment. We demonstrate that the anti-corruption campaign launched by the Chinese government in 2012 effectively weakened the power of princeling connections. Overall, our study suggests that by distorting bank lending decisions and encouraging over-investment, the involvement of princelings in firms causes resource misallocation which favours princeling-backed firms and discourages investment in non-princeling-backed firms.
机译:本研究调查了原则在中国上市公司的作用。我们的调查结果表明,原则确保更好地获得非国有企业的银行贷款,但为国有企业带来没有明显的福利。我们的经验结果进一步表明,由于他们可以通过原则的家庭联系,他们可以从政府的更高层次获得的特权和保护,银行贷款决策扭曲了归属公司。此外,我们发现,由于长期银行贷款超出了长期的银行贷款,原则支持的非SOES倾向于过度投资,最终导致投资效率降低。此外,我们使用差异差分方法来捕捉到中国最近反腐败运动的外源冲击对原则和企业融资和投资的影响。我们表明,2012年中国政府推出的反腐败运动有效地减弱了原则联系的力量。总体而言,我们的研究表明,通过扭曲银行贷款决策和鼓励过度投资,将原则涉及公司的参与会导致资源错误分配,这些资源误放大,这些资源误解了普及的公司,并劝阻对非公主支持的投资。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号