...
首页> 外文期刊>Oxford Energy Forum >The UK Energy Review and Nuclear Power
【24h】

The UK Energy Review and Nuclear Power

机译:英国能源评论与核电

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The danger with the DTI's Energy Review is that it will give the wrong answers to some questions that do not need answering, and fail to address those that do need answers. Nuclear is a case in point. The prime question here is whether nuclear has a role to play in reducing carbon emissions. The Prime Minister seems to have decided that the answer is yes. And he must be right. Faced "with a global warming crisis it would be extraordinary folly to rule out one possible avenue. But the critics, not excluding some respected bodies and individuals, are effectively saying that a choice has to be made by the government between nuclear and renewables, and nuclear should be ruled out. The argument runs that renewables are capable of solving the problem; that no nuclear capacity will be available until 2016 at the earliest, and so it is not worth embarking on a new nuclear programme; and that we cannot manage the pursuit of both renewables and nuclear at the same time - a new nuclear programme would crowd out renewables.
机译:DTI的《能源评估》的危险在于,它会为一些不需要回答的问题提供错误的答案,而无法解决确实需要回答的问题。核就是一个例子。这里的主要问题是核能在减少碳排放中是否可以发挥作用。首相似乎已经决定答案是肯定的。而且他一定是对的。面对“全球变暖危机,排除一个可能的途径是非常愚蠢的。但是,批评家们并没有排除一些受人尊敬的机构和个人,实际上是在说,政府必须在核能和可再生能源之间做出选择,并且有观点认为,可再生能源有能力解决这一问题;最早要到2016年才能提供核电,因此不值得开展新的核计划;而且我们无法管理核电。同时追求可再生能源和核能-新的核计划将挤出可再生能源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号