首页> 外文期刊>Oxford Economic Papers >Contracting out public service provision to not-for-profit firms
【24h】

Contracting out public service provision to not-for-profit firms

机译:将公共服务提供外包给非营利性公司

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In an incomplete-contract setting, we analyse the contracting out of public service provision, comparing the performance of for-profit (FP) and not-for-profit (NP) firms. Two institutional arrangements are considered, control rights lying either with the firm (PPP) or the government (traditional procurement). We show that provision by an NP may be associated with overinvestment in quality improvement, but that under conditions that restrain this overinvestment, the NP may yield greater welfare than obtains with FP-provision. Although none of the four possible arrangements is preferable under all conditions, the introduction of PPP has enhanced the scope for advantageous provision by an NP.
机译:在不完全合同的情况下,我们分析了公共服务提供之外的承包,比较了营利性(FP)和非营利性(NP)公司的绩效。考虑了两种制度安排,控制权属于公司(PPP)或政府(传统采购)。我们表明,NP的提供可能与质量改善方面的过度投资有关,但是在限制这种过度投资的条件下,NP可能会比FP-provision带来更大的福利。尽管在所有情况下四种可能的安排都不是可取的,但是PPP的引入扩大了NP有利提供的范围。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Oxford Economic Papers》 |2010年第4期|P.784-802|共19页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Economics and Finance, and CEDI, Brunei University, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH;

    rnDepartment of Economics and Finance, and CEDI, Brunei University, DEI, University of Rome Tor Vergata, and CMPO;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:34:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号