首页> 外文期刊>Organization Studies >Moving Institutional Logics Forward: Emotion and Meaningful Material Practice
【24h】

Moving Institutional Logics Forward: Emotion and Meaningful Material Practice

机译:推进制度逻辑:情感和有意义的物质实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Institutional theory, and the institutional logics approach in particular, lacks the feelings that produce, sustain and disrupt institutional practice. This is due in part to rational, instrumental understandings of the individual in practice, and in part to the cognitive and linguistic understanding of that practice, sustained by classification, qualification and belief. Emotion, a joining of language and bodily affect, is ready at hand for institutional theory. There is increasing recognition that emotion is a powerful device for institutionalization and de-institutionalization. In this essay, I consider emotion's position in institutional theory and how we might position it in an institutional logics approach. I will argue that emotion not only mediates institutions, but can itself be institutional.
机译:制度理论,尤其是制度逻辑方法,缺乏产生,维持和破坏制度实践的感觉。这部分归因于对个人在实践中的理性,工具性理解,部分归因于通过分类,资格和信念维持的对该实践的认知和语言理解。情感是语言和身体情感的结合,已经准备好用于制度理论。人们越来越认识到,情感是制度化和反制度化的有力手段。在本文中,我将探讨情感在制度理论中的地位,以及我们如何将其置于制度逻辑方法中。我将辩称,情感不仅可以调解制度,而且本身可以成为制度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号