首页> 外文期刊>Organization: The Critical Journal of Organization, Theory and Society >Spaces of open-source politics: Physical and digital conditions for political organization
【24h】

Spaces of open-source politics: Physical and digital conditions for political organization

机译:开源政治空间:政治组织的物理和数字条件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The recent proliferation of Web 2.0 applications and their role in contemporary political life have inspired the coining of the term open-source politics'. This article analyzes how open-source politics is organized in the case of a radical political party in Denmark called The Alternative. Inspired by the literature on organizational space, the analysis explores how different organizational spaces configure the party's process of policy development, thereby adding to our understanding of the relationship between organizational space and political organization. We analyze three different spaces constructed by The Alternative as techniques for practicing open-source politics and observe that physical and digital spaces create an oscillation between openness and closure. In turn, this oscillation produces a dialectical relationship between practices of imagination and affirmation. Curiously, it seems that physical spaces open up the political process, while digital spaces close it down by fixing meaning. Accordingly, we argue that open-source politics should not be equated with online politics but may be highly dependent on physical spaces. Furthermore, digital spaces may provide both closure and disconnection between a party's universal body and its particular body. In conclusion, however, we propose that such a disconnection might be a precondition for success when institutionalizing radical politics, as it allows parties like The Alternative to maintain their universal appeal.
机译:Web 2.0应用程序的最近扩散及其在当代政治生活中的作用激发了“开源政治”这一术语的产生。本文分析了在丹麦激进政党“另类”的情况下开源政治的组织方式。受到有关组织空间的文献的启发,该分析探讨了不同的组织空间如何配置党的政策制定过程,从而加深了我们对组织空间与政治组织之间关系的理解。我们分析了《另类》作为实践开放源代码政治的技术所构造的三个不同空间,并观察到物理和数字空间在开放性和封闭性之间产生了振荡。反过来,这种振荡在想象力和肯定的实践之间产生了辩证关系。奇怪的是,似乎物理空间打开了政治进程,而数字空间则通过固定含义将其关闭。因此,我们认为开源政治不应等同于在线政治,而可能高度依赖物理空间。此外,数字空间可以提供一方的通用实体及其特定实体之间的闭合和断开连接。但是,总而言之,我们认为,这种分离可能是将激进政治制度化时成功的前提,因为它允许像“另类”之类的政党保持其普遍的吸引力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号