首页> 外文期刊>Organic Electronics >Intrinsic charge carrier mobility in single-crystal OFET by 'fast trapping vs. slow detrapping' model
【24h】

Intrinsic charge carrier mobility in single-crystal OFET by 'fast trapping vs. slow detrapping' model

机译:通过“快速俘获与缓慢解俘获”模型在单晶OFET中的本征载流子迁移率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigates the gate stress-induced mobility discrepancy inp-type single-crystal organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) on an octyltrichlorosilane (OTS)-modified SiO2/Si substrate. During measurements in atmosphere, anti-clockwise hysteresis was observed in the transfer curve, and the mobility calculated from the forward sweep was smaller than that calculated from the reverse sweep. Hysteresis has often been observed for OFETs but the mobility discrepancy has not been clearly understood. We formulated a “fast trapping vs. slow detrapping” model and suggested that the mobility values calculated from the reverse sweep represent the intrinsic property of the material. To verify the validity of this model, we investigated mobility anisotropy of an air-stable organic semiconductor, 2,7-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)benzo[b]benzo[4,5]thieno[2,3-d]thiophene (DBOP-BTBT). By measuring the single-crystal OFET characteristics of many crystals with different orientations, we observed anisotropic hole mobility calculated from the reverse sweep. The mobility along theb-axis, which corresponds to theπ-πstacking direction, was 13.9 cm2 V−1 s−1, and that along thea-axis was 6.2 cm2 V−1 s−1. However, we did not see clear anisotropy when mobility was calculated from the forward sweep due to a variation in the data. The threshold voltage from the reverse and the forward sweeps showed isotropic characteristics within the range from −60 to −70 V and from −50 to −60 V, respectively. These results indicate that the numbers of filled traps were different between the reverse and the forward sweeps at the interface, and confirm the validity of our model.
机译:这项研究调查了在辛基三氯硅烷(OTS)改性的SiO2 / Si衬底上栅极应力引起的迁移率差异inp型单晶有机场效应晶体管(OFET)。在大气中进行测量时,在传输曲线中观察到了逆时针方向的磁滞,从正向扫描计算出的迁移率小于从反向扫描计算出的迁移率。经常观察到OFET的滞后现象,但尚未清楚地了解迁移率差异。我们制定了“快速捕集与慢速捕集”模型,并建议通过反向扫描计算出的迁移率值代表了材料的固有特性。为了验证该模型的有效性,我们研究了空气稳定的有机半导体2,7-双(4-甲氧基苯基)苯并[b]苯并[4,5]噻吩并[2,3-d]噻吩的迁移率各向异性( DBOP-BTBT)。通过测量许多具有不同取向的晶体的单晶OFET特性,我们观察到由反向扫描计算出的各向异性空穴迁移率。沿b轴对应于π-π堆叠方向的迁移率是13.9 cm2 V-1 s-1,而沿着a轴的迁移率是6.2 cm2 V-1 s-1。但是,由于数据变化,从前向扫描计算迁移率时,我们没有看到明显的各向异性。来自反向扫描和正向扫描的阈值电压分别显示出从-60到-70 withinV和从-50到-60 V的各向同性特性。这些结果表明,在界面的反向扫描和正向扫描之间,填充陷阱的数量是不同的,并证实了我们模型的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号