首页> 外文期刊>Open economies review >Is Foreign Technological Advance Harmful in the Melitz Model?
【24h】

Is Foreign Technological Advance Harmful in the Melitz Model?

机译:梅利兹模型是否对国外技术进步有害?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Foreign technological advance unambiguously reduces home welfare in a popular variant of the Melitz (Econometrica 71(6):1695-1725, 2003) model that assumes the presence of a costlessly traded homogeneous (outside) good (Demidova in Int Econ Rev 49(4):1437-1462, 2008). The present paper shows that this result is sensitive to the presence of the outside good and is, in fact, reversed in its absence: foreign technological advance always improves home welfare in the Melitz model without the outside good. Improvement in home welfare occurs via changes in the numbers and prices of domestic and imported varieties. For quantitative analysis of welfare effects, we calibrate an international trade model for the United States and its major trading partners. US is found to gain less from foreign technological improvements than its trading partners from US improvements. In either case, the magnitude of gains is modest.
机译:国外技术的发展无疑会以Melitz(Econometrica 71(6):1695-1725,2003)模型的流行变体明确降低家庭福利,该模型假设存在无价交易的同质(外部)商品(Demidova in Int Econ Rev 49(4) ):1437-1462,2008)。本文表明,该结果对外部商品的存在很敏感,并且在没有外部商品的情况下实际上是相反的:在没有外部商品的梅利兹模型中,外国技术进步总是会改善家庭福利。家庭福利的改善是通过改变国内和进口品种的数量和价格来实现的。为了对福利影响进行定量分析,我们为美国及其主要贸易伙伴校准了国际贸易模型。人们发现,美国从外国技术改进中获得的收益要少于其贸易伙伴从美国改进中获得的收益。无论哪种情况,增益的大小都是适中的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号