首页> 外文期刊>Online searcher >Evidence and the Search for Truth
【24h】

Evidence and the Search for Truth

机译:证据和寻找真理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

No one who is paying attention can fail to grasp that we are in an information firestorm. "Post-truth," "fake news," "alternate facts"-confusion escalates with every passing day. The same pieces of evidence result in differing and highly polarized interpretations. If there is a search for truth, it has become a search for personal truths, which are many and varied. Controversy over the authority of information is certainly one of the biggest challenges of our day-and a growing nightmare for those of us teaching information literacy. The critical information literacy movement that emerged in the late 1990s was supposed to help people think more intelligently about the social, political, and economic factors underlying information, and it has done well in that regard. Yet "critical information literacy" relies on critical thinking using commonly accepted tools to evaluate what we are encountering. This kind of evaluation is becoming less common in our world.
机译:没有人关注的人无法掌握我们处于信息凤。 “后真理”,“假新闻”,“替代事实” - 康复随着每一天升级。相同的证据导致不同和高度极化的解释。如果有寻找真理,它已成为寻求个人真理的搜索,这很多和各种各样。关于信息权威的争议肯定是我们日日最大的挑战之一 - 以及我们教学信息素养的那些日益增加的噩梦。 20世纪90年代后期出现的关键信息素养运动应该帮助人们更智能地了解社会,政治和经济因素的信息,在这方面做得很好。然而“关键信息素养”依赖于使用普通接受的工具来评估我们在遇到的内容的批判性思考。这种评估在我们的世界中变得不那么常见。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Online searcher》 |2020年第4期|36-38|共3页
  • 作者

    William Badke;

  • 作者单位

    Trinity Western University;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 21:30:58

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号