...
首页> 外文期刊>Omega >Non-collaborative and collaborative financing in a bilateral supply chain with capital constraints
【24h】

Non-collaborative and collaborative financing in a bilateral supply chain with capital constraints

机译:资金受限的双边供应链中的非合作和合作融资

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We consider three kinds of financing strategies for a bilateral supply chain in which both the supplier and retailer are financially constrained. The three financing strategies are bank financing separately (BFS), bank financing with trade credit (BF-with-TC) and bank financing with the supplier's guarantee (BF-withSG). The first one is regarded as a non-collaborative strategy, and the last two are regarded as collaborative strategies. By comparing the equilibrium decisions under the three financing strategies, we find that: (1) overall, collaborative strategies dominate non-collaborative strategy for the supplier and whole supply chain, whereas the reverse holds for the retailer; (2) BF-with-SG strategy performs the same as BFS strategy for all partners when the supplier provides no guarantee; (3) BF-with-SG strategy may outperform BF-with-TC strategy for the whole supply chain, depending on partners' capital level as well as the supplier's guarantee ratio; (4) surprisingly, collaborative strategies do not necessarily result in less risk for the bank compared to non-collaborative strategy. Managerially, our results show that in some cases, all supply chain partners can perform better if the leader acts as a guarantor rather than as an intermediary creditor. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:我们考虑了双边供应链的三种融资策略,其中供应商和零售商都受到财务约束。这三种融资策略分别是银行融资(BFS),带有贸易信贷的银行融资(BF-with-TC)和带有供应商担保的银行融资(BF-withSG)。第一个被视为非合作策略,后两个被视为合作策略。通过比较三种融资策略下的均衡决策,我们发现:(1)总体而言,协作策略在供应商和整个供应链的非协作策略中占主导地位,而零售商则相反。 (2)当供应商不提供保证时,BF-with-SG策略对所有合作伙伴的执行效果与BFS策略相同; (3)BF-with-SG策略在整个供应链中的表现可能优于BF-with-TC策略,这取决于合作伙伴的资本水平以及供应商的担保率; (4)令人惊讶的是,与非合作策略相比,合作策略不一定会降低银行的风险。从管理上讲,我们的结果表明,在某些情况下,如果领导者充当担保人而不是中间债权人,则所有供应链合作伙伴都可以表现更好。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Omega》 |2019年第10期|210-222|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ Sch Finance Hangzhou 310018 Zhejiang Peoples R China|Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ Antai Coll Econ & Management Shanghai 200030 Peoples R China;

    Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ Sino US Global Logist Inst Shanghai 200030 Peoples R China;

    Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ Antai Coll Econ & Management Shanghai 200030 Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Supply chain management; Capital constraints; Stackelberg game; Stochastic demand;

    机译:供应链管理;资金限制;Stackelberg游戏;随机需求;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号