...
首页> 外文期刊>Oceanographic Literature Review >Radiosonde comparison of ERA5 and ERA-Interim reanalysis datasets over tropical oceans
【24h】

Radiosonde comparison of ERA5 and ERA-Interim reanalysis datasets over tropical oceans

机译:ERA5和ERA-临时再分析数据集在热带海洋上的无线电探空仪比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

After the release of the ERA-Interim reanalysis, many changes have been made to the Integrated Forecasting System model and data-assimilation system, resulting in an improved reanalysis, ERA5. One of the changes in the model allows the model version in ERA5 to represent the moisture sensitivity of deep convection more realistically than the model version in ERA-Interim. A previous modeling study showed that this change alone improved the representation of the tropical atmosphere, e.g. tropical variability and precipitation distribution. Here we compare the vertical structures of average temperature and moisture over tropical oceans in ERAS, ERA-Interim and radiosonde observations to see whether ERA5 is also closer to observations for those regions and variables. Our results reveal that at many levels, temperature and relative humidity in ERA5 and ERA-Interim differ from observations, however ERA-Interim is generally closer to observations than ERA5 in the low-to-midtroposphere. Most notably, in many stations, ERA5 is on average colder than observations at ~550-800 hPa. Large vertical gradients occur in the profile of the mean temperature difference between ERA5 and observations at ~700-900 hPa, but are absent in ERA-Interim. Relative humidity differences are not as robust as temperature differences, however in many stations ERA5 is on average moister than observations at ~650-800 hPa while ERA-Interim is closer to observations there. Below the ~950 hPa-level ERA5 and ERA-Interim are generally colder and moister than observations. Our results indicate that ERA5 deviates more than ERA-Interim from tropical radiosonde observations in the low-to-midtroposphere. It seems plausible that this deviation is, at least partly, due to the newer formulation of organised deep entrainment in ERA5 and the associated mechanism for the moisture sensitivity. However, more extensive model evaluation is needed to understand the reasons for the differences between the reanalyses and radiosonde observations.
机译:在释放ERA临时再分析后,已经对集成预测系统模型和数据同化系统进行了许多变化,从而改善了再分析,ERA5。该模型的一个更改允许ERA5中的模型版本来表示深度对流的湿度灵敏度,而不是ERA临时中的模型版本。以前的建模研究表明,这种改变单独改善了热带气氛的表示,例如,改善了热带气氛的代表性。热带变异性和降水分布。在这里,我们将热带海洋的平均温度和水分的垂直结构进行比较,以时代,ERA-interim和无线电探测器观察,看看ERA5是否也更接近那些区域和变量的观察。我们的结果表明,在许多级别,ERA5和ERA临时的温度和相对湿度与观察结果不同,但是时期临时通常比在低对中间层的ERA5更接近观察。最值得注意的是,在许多站点,ERA5平均低于〜550-800 HPA的观察。在ERA5之间的平均温差和〜700-900hPa的观察分布中发生大的垂直梯度,但在时代临时不存在。相对湿度差异与温度差异不那么稳健,然而在许多站点中,ERA5在平均水下比在〜650-800 HPA的观察中,而ERA-Instim更接近那里的观察。低于〜950 HPA级的ERA5和ERA临时通常比观察结果更冷和泡沫。我们的结果表明,ERA5在低到中间层的热带无线电观察中偏离了超过时期的时期。由于ERA5中的有组织的深夹带的新配方和水分敏感性的相关机制,这种偏差似乎是合理的。然而,需要更广泛的模型评估来了解Reanalyses和Reasonde观察结果的差异的原因。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Oceanographic Literature Review》 |2021年第7期|1605-1605|共1页
  • 作者单位

    Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR) University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland;

    Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR) University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland;

    Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR) University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号