首页> 外文期刊>Oceanographic Literature Review >The Strong Stratospheric Polar Vortex in March 2020 in Sub-Seasonal to Seasonal Models: Implications for Empirical Prediction of the Low Arctic Total Ozone Extreme
【24h】

The Strong Stratospheric Polar Vortex in March 2020 in Sub-Seasonal to Seasonal Models: Implications for Empirical Prediction of the Low Arctic Total Ozone Extreme

机译:2020年3月在季节性模型的强大平流层极性涡旋:对低北极总臭氧极端的实证预测的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Using reanalysis and real-time forecasts from 11 sub-seasonal to seasonal (S2S) models, the strong stratospheric polar vortex in March 2020 coupled with Arctic ozone loss and their predictability are reported in this study. Arctic ozone reached a minimum value in March 2020 similar to the events in 1997 and 2011. Upward propagation of waves into the stratosphere in winter-early spring was anomalously weak, and the weakened Brewer-Dobson circulation transported less ozone-rich air to the Arctic stratosphere in November 2019-March 2020, which contributes around 40% of the total Arctic ozone loss in March, with the residual mainly explained by the chemical loss. Anomalous upwelling in the Arctic further cooled and intensified the polar vortex for ozone depletion and weak mixing, preventing recovery of ozone in early spring 2020. The polar vortex intensity and Arctic total ozone are strongly coupled, so a prediction of Arctic total ozone becomes possible for S2S models using metrics of the polar vortex as a proxy. The prediction of the strong stratospheric polar vortex in late March 2020 is assessed for four common initializations (February 27, March 5, March 12, and March 19) for S2S models. Displacement of the polar vortex toward the Western Hemisphere can only be forecasted in the two later initializations, and its intensity anomaly is underestimated in nearly all of those forecasts. Therefore, the empirical model using the S2S outputs also underestimates the Arctic total ozone. Despite this underestimation, this extremely strong polar vortex event led to improved surface predictability on subseasonal timescales: near-surface temperature and precipitation are well forecasted 2-3 weeks in advance.
机译:利用来自11个季节性到季节性(S2S)模型的再分析和实时预报,3月2020年3月与北极臭氧损失的强平流层极性涡流及其可预测性在本研究中报告。北极臭氧于3月2020年达到了最低价值,类似于1997年和2011年的事件。波浪在冬季春季的平流层上的向上传播令人鼓气弱,弱化的酿酒师 - 多人循环循环向北极运输较少的臭氧空气2019年11月至3月2020年11月的平流层贡献了3月份北极臭氧损失的约40%,剩余物体主要通过化学损失解释。北极进一步冷却并加强了臭氧耗竭和弱混合的极性涡旋,防止臭氧在早春2020中恢复。极性涡旋强度和北极总臭氧是强烈耦合的,因此可以预测北极总臭氧的预测S2S模型使用极性涡流的指标作为代理。为S2S模型(3月27日,3月5日,3月5日,3月19日)进行了评估了2020年3月2020年3月2020年3月20日强的平流层极性涡旋的预测。只能在两种后来的初始化中预测极地漩涡朝向西半球的位移,并且其强度异常在几乎所有这些预测中被低估。因此,使用S2S输出的实证模型也低估了北极总臭氧。尽管这种低估了,但这种极强的极性漩涡事件导致了改善了诸暂时的时间尺度的表面可预测性:近表面温度和降水预测预先预测2-3周。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Oceanographic Literature Review》 |2021年第6期|1230-1230|共1页
  • 作者

    J. Rao; C.I. Garfinkel;

  • 作者单位

    Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster Ministry of Education (KLME) / Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change (ILCEC) / Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC- FEMD) Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology Nanjing China;

    Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster Ministry of Education (KLME) / Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change (ILCEC) / Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC- FEMD) Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology Nanjing China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 02:27:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号